ACCURACY ANALYSIS OF UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY USING RGB AND MULTISPECTRAL SENSORS

被引:0
作者
Santrac, Nikola [1 ]
Benka, Pavel [1 ]
Batilovic, Mehmed [2 ]
Zemunac, Rados
Antic, Sanja [1 ]
Stajic, Milica [1 ]
Antonic, Nenad [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Agr, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 8, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
[2] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Tech Sci, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
[3] Cinteraction, Nikolajevska 2, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
关键词
UAV photogrammetry; multi; -altitude; data quality; ground; control points; flight parameters; multispectral sensor; accuracy; FROM-MOTION PHOTOGRAMMETRY; GEOMETRY; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2023.04.459-472
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In recent years, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become increasingly important as a tool for quickly collecting high-resolution (spatial and spectral) imagery of the Earth's surface. The final products are highly dependent on the choice of values for various parameters in flight planning, the type of sensors, and the processing of the data. In this paper ground control points (GCPs) were first measured using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) method, and then due to the low height accuracy of the GNSS RTK method all points were measured using a detailed leveling method. This study aims to provide a basic assessment of quality, including four main aspects: (1) the difference between an RGB sensor and a five-band multispectral sensor on accuracy and the amount of data, (2) the impact of the number of GCPs on the accuracy of the final products, (3) the impact of different altitudes and cross flight strips, and (4) the accuracy analysis of multi-altitude models. The results suggest that the type of sensor, flight configuration, and GCP setup strongly affect the quality and quantity of the final product data while creating a multi -altitude model does not result in the expected quality of data. With its unique combination of sensors and parameters, the results and recommendations presented in this paper can assist professionals and researchers in their future work.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 472
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation ground control points number using unmanned aerial vehicle [J].
Aguera-Vega, Francisco ;
Carvajal-Ramírez, Fernando ;
Martinez-Carricondo, Patricio .
MEASUREMENT, 2017, 98 :221-227
[2]   Geometry accuracy of DSM in water body margin obtained from an RGB camera with NIR band and a multispectral sensor embedded in UAV [J].
de Castro Vitti, Dalva Maria ;
Marques Junior, Ademir ;
Guimaraes, Taina Thomassin ;
Koste, Emilie Caroline ;
Inocencio, Leonardo Campos ;
Veronez, Mauricio Roberto ;
Mauad, Frederico Fabio .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 52 (sup1) :160-173
[3]   Quality Assessment of DSMs Produced from UAV Flights Georeferenced with On-Board RTK Positioning [J].
Forlani, Gianfranco ;
Dall'Asta, Elisa ;
Diotri, Fabrizio ;
di Cella, Umberto Morra ;
Roncella, Riccardo ;
Santise, Marina .
REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (02)
[4]  
Fras M. K., 2021, Geodetski Vestnik, V65
[5]   Accuracy Analysis of Photogrammetric UAV Image Blocks: Influence of Onboard RTK-GNSS and Cross Flight Patterns [J].
Gerke, Markus ;
Przybilla, Heinz-Juergen .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIE FERNERKUNDUNG GEOINFORMATION, 2016, (01) :17-30
[6]   Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles′ Imagery on Glaciers [J].
Gindraux, Saskia ;
Boesch, Ruedi ;
Farinotti, Daniel .
REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (02)
[7]   Using a UAV Thermal Infrared Camera for Monitoring Floating Marine Plastic Litter [J].
Goddijn-Murphy, Lonneke ;
Williamson, Benjamin J. ;
McIlvenny, Jason ;
Corradi, Paolo .
REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (13)
[8]  
Hugenholtz C., 2016, GEOMATICA, V70, P21, DOI [10.5623/cig2016-102, DOI 10.5623/CIG2016-102]
[9]  
Imai N. N., 2019, Int. Arch. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci, V42, P371
[10]  
International Standardization Organization (ISO), 2013, ISO 19157: 2013