Contrasting MMPI-3 Validity Scale Effectiveness Differences Across In-Person and Telehealth Administration Procedures

被引:10
作者
Agarwal, Lillian P. [1 ]
Keen, Megan A. [1 ]
Morris, Cole S. [1 ]
Ingram, Paul B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, Lubbock, TX USA
[2] Eastern Kansas Vet Healthcare Syst, Dwight D Eisenhower Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Leavenworth, KS USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, 2810 18th St, Lubbock, TX 79423 USA
关键词
psychological assessment; feigning; Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3; overreporting; FEIGNED MENTAL-DISORDERS; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1037/pas0001258
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Psychological assessment underwent substantive challenges and changes when the COVID-19 pandemic began, and these changes are likely to endure given the rapid growth of telehealth clinical practice and assessment research using virtual procedures. COVID-19-related changes to assessment practices have impacted accordingly how we study overreporting scale functioning, including the modality through which we administer measures. No available research provides direct comparisons of overreporting scale effectiveness within simulation research across in-person and telehealth modalities, despite early support for novel instruments relying on remote procedures within the historic context of the pandemic. We used simulated feigning conditions collected using best telehealth practices to examine if, and how, overreporting scales differed in effectiveness by evaluating mean scores, elevation rates, and classification accuracy statistics, relative to parallel in-person conditions. Results indicate no meaningful differences in scale effectiveness, particularly when exclusion procedures included a posttest questionnaire. Our findings support telehealth assessment practice and the integration of research collected virtually into the traditional, in-person feigning literature. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 937
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, MMPI-2-RF references by topic
[2]  
August Justin O, 2021, Afr J Psychol Assess, V3, P74, DOI 10.4102/ajopa.v3i0.74
[3]  
Ben-Porath Y., 2020, MINNESOTA MULTIPHASI
[4]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2011, Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation
[5]   InterOrganizational practice committee recommendations/guidance for teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Bilder, Robert M. ;
Postal, Karen S. ;
Barisa, Mark ;
Aase, Darrin M. ;
Cullum, C. Munro ;
Gillaspy, Stephen R. ;
Harder, Lana ;
Kanter, Geoffrey ;
Lanca, Margaret ;
Lechuga, David M. ;
Morgan, Jennifer M. ;
Most, Randi ;
Puente, Antonio E. ;
Salinas, Christine M. ;
Woodhouse, Jonathan .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2020, 34 (7-8) :1314-1334
[6]   Methodological Considerations for Developing and Evaluating Response Bias Indicators [J].
Burchett, Danielle ;
Ben-Porath, Yossef S. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2019, 31 (12) :1497-1511
[7]   An MTurk Crisis? Shifts in Data Quality and the Impact on Study Results [J].
Chmielewski, Michael ;
Kucker, Sarah C. .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (04) :464-473
[8]   Assessing Negative Response Bias with the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-IV (MCMI-IV): a Review of the Literature [J].
Choca, James P. ;
Pignolo, Claudia .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW, 2022, 15 (01) :48-55
[9]   Neuropsychology consultation to identify learning disorders in children and adolescents: a proposal based on lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Colvin, M. K. ;
Forchelli, G. A. ;
Reese, K. L. ;
Capawana, M. R. ;
Beery, C. S. ;
Murphy, J. ;
Doyle, A. E. ;
O'Keefe, S. M. ;
Braaten, E. B. .
CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 28 (05) :671-688
[10]   Practical Guidance on the Use of the MMPI Instruments in Remote Psychological Testing [J].
Corey, David M. ;
Ben-Porath, Yossef S. .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 51 (03) :199-204