Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions

被引:2
|
作者
Umeh, Chukwuemeka Anthony [1 ,4 ]
Stratton, Ashley [1 ]
Wagner, Tifani [1 ]
Saigal, Shipra [1 ]
Sood, Krystal [1 ]
Dhawan, Raghav [1 ]
Wagner, Cory [1 ]
Obi, Jessica [1 ]
Kumar, Sabina [2 ]
Ching, Tsung Han Scottie [1 ]
Gupta, Rahul [3 ]
机构
[1] Hemet Global Med Ctr, Internal Med, Hemet, CA 92543 USA
[2] Mclaren Macomb Oakland Michigan State Univ, Dept Cardiol, Macomb, MI 48043 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Internal Med, San Diego, CA 92122 USA
[4] Hemet Global Med Ctr, Internal Med, 1117 E Devonshire Ave, Hemet, CA 92543 USA
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2023年 / 15卷 / 08期
关键词
Intravascular lithotripsy; Peripheral artery disease; Non-coronary artery; LOWER-EXTREMITY; MEDICAL THERAPY; SAFETY; DISEASE; REVASCULARIZATION; INTERVENTION; METAANALYSIS; LITHOPLASTY; ATHERECTOMY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.4330/wjc.v15.i8.395
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technique increasingly used for plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in patients with severe calcification and peripheral artery disease. However, much of the available literature on IVL is focused on its use in coronary arteries, with relatively limited data on non-coronary artery use.AIM To analyze the safety and efficacy of current IVL use in non-coronary artery lesions, as reported in case reports and case series.METHODS We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Reference Citation Analysis databases for case reports and case series on IVL use in peripheral artery disease. We then extracted variables of interest and calculated the mean and proportions of these variables.RESULTS We included 60 patients from 33 case reports/case series. Ninety-eight percent of the cases had IVL usage in only one blood vessel, while four had the IVL used in two vessels (2.0%), resulting in 64 Lesions treated with IVL. The mean age of the patients was 73.7 (SD 10.9). IVL was successfully used in severe iliofemoral artery stenosis (51.6%), severe innominate, subclavian, and carotid artery stenosis (26.7% combined), and severe mesenteric vessel stenosis (9.4%). Additionally, IVL was successfully used in severe renal (7.8%) and aortic artery (4.7%) stenosis. There were complications in 12% of the cases, with dissection being the commonest.CONCLUSION IVL has successfully used in plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in severely calcified and challenging lesions in the iliofemoral, carotid, subclavian, aorta, renal, and mesenteric vessels. The most severe but transient complications were with IVL use in the aortic arch and neck arteries.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 405
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Early experience of intravascular lithotripsy in unprotected calcified left main coronary artery disease
    Hesse, Kerrick
    Shahid, Farhan
    Ahmed, Raheel
    Ahmed, Faizan
    Cartlidge, Timothy R. G.
    Rashid, Muhammad
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Mintz, Gary S.
    Ahmed, Javed M.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2023, 55 : 33 - 41
  • [32] Review of intravascular lithotripsy for treating coronary, peripheral artery, and valve calcifications
    Gruslova, Aleksandra B.
    Inanc, Ibrahim H.
    Cilingiroglu, Mehmet
    Katta, Nitesh
    Milner, Thomas E.
    Feldman, Marc D.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 103 (02) : 295 - 307
  • [33] Synergistic Coronary Artery Calcium Modification With Combined Atherectomy and Intravascular Lithotripsy
    Wong, Bernard
    Kam, Kevin Ka-Ho
    So, Chak-Yu
    Tam, Guang-Min
    Chi, Wai Kin
    Chui, Ka-Lung
    Wu, Eugene B.
    Chan, Joseph Yat-Sun
    Yan, Bryan P.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 35 (03) : E128 - E135
  • [34] Efficacy and Safety of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Calcified Coronary Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mhanna, Mohammed
    Beran, Azizullah
    Nazir, Salik
    Sajdeya, Omar
    Srour, Omar
    Elzanaty, Ahmed
    Eltahawy, Ehab A.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2022, 36 : 73 - 82
  • [35] Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy: The Future of Coronary Intervention?
    Thirumurugan, E.
    Gomathi, K.
    Karthick, R.
    RESEARCH IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04) : 103 - 107
  • [36] Intravascular Lithotripsy for Optimal Angioplasty of Infrapopliteal Calcified Lesions
    Giannopoulos, Stefanos
    Armstrong, Ehrin J.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 34 (02) : E132 - E141
  • [37] Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of calcific coronary lesions in ST elevation myocardial infarction
    Cosgrove, Claudia
    Hanratty, Colm G.
    Hill, Jonathan M.
    Mahadevan, Kalaivani
    Mailey, Jonathan
    McEntegart, Margaret
    O'Kane, Peter
    Sidik, Novalia
    Strange, Julian W.
    Walsh, Simon J.
    Wilson, Simon
    Yeoh, Julian
    Spratt, James C.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 99 (02) : 322 - 328
  • [38] Clinical and Technical Predictors of Treatment Success After Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy in Calcific Coronary Lesions
    van Oort, Martijn J. H.
    Bingen, Brian O.
    Oliveri, Federico
    Al Amri, Ibtihal
    Phagu, Akshay A. S.
    Claessen, Bimmer E. P. M.
    Dimitriu-Leen, Aukelien C.
    Vossenberg, Tessel N.
    Kefer, Joelle
    Girgis, Hany
    van der Kley, Frank
    Jukema, J. Wouter
    Montero-Cabezas, Jose M.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2025, : 1418 - 1426
  • [39] Clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: An updated meta-analysis
    Sattar, Yasar
    Almas, Talal
    Arshad, Junaid
    Zghouzi, Mohamed
    Ullah, Waqas
    Mir, Tanveer
    Mohamed, Mohamed O.
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Aljaroudi, Wael
    Prasad, Anand
    Shlofmitz, Richard
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Kereiakes, Dean J.
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2022, 39
  • [40] Coronary intravascular lithotripsy: the tombstone of coronary calcium
    Bohra, Chandrashekar
    Gulati, Amit
    Hooda, Amit
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2024,