Patient and parent satisfaction with soft cast immobilization and a single visit for buckle fractures

被引:1
作者
Pretorius, Jacques [1 ]
Nemat, Nouman [2 ]
Duffy, Noelle [3 ]
Alsayed, Almutaz Billah [3 ]
机构
[1] Galway Univ Hosp, Newcastle Rd, Galway H91YR71, Galway, Ireland
[2] Waterford Univ Hosp, Dunmore Rd, Waterford X91ER8E, Ireland
[3] Letterkenny Univ Hosp, Kilmacrennan Rd, Letterkenny F92AE81, Donegal, Ireland
关键词
Torus fracture; Buckle fracture; Distal radius; Single contact; Non -rigid immobilization; Soft cast; Patient satisfaction; DISTAL RADIUS; TORUS FRACTURES; HOME MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN; BANDAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jor.2022.12.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Compression fractures of the distal radius (known as buckle or torus fractures) should be managed with non-rigid immobilization and a single visit as per the NICE guidelines. A recent national survey demonstrated ongoing reluctance to incorporate this treatment strategy in Ireland, with more than 70% of institutions still managing these fractures with the traditional method (rigid cast immobilization and fracture clinic follow up). In this study we assessed whether this could be attributed to parent or carer preference.Methods: All paediatric patients from January 2021 to August 2022 in a single centre with buckle fractures of the distal radius were included in this study. A 10-question survey was created to assess whether the care giver and patient was satisfied with the information supplied, method of stabilization, single point of contact, and selfremoval of the soft cast. A maximum of 5 points could be given to each score with a maximum of 50 for the overall satisfaction of care.Results: A total of 82 surveys were completed via the post or telephonically. The two lowest average scores were 3.77 (SD +/- 1.20) and 3.95 (SD +/- 1.24), which indicated that patients would have no issues organising a follow up appointment and difficulty with cast removal respectively. Three other questions scored slightly better with 4.12 (SD +/- 1.02), 4.17 (SD +/- 1.04) and 4.22 (SD +/- 1.05) which demonstrated some dissatisfaction with the cast condition at time of removal, difficulty with returning to school directly after removal and a desire to have another follow up appointment respectively. The highest average score was for adequacy of information provided at the time of treatment, 4.58 (SD +/- 0.67). Furthermore, high scores were also given to the questions regarding confidence in the stability provided by the soft cast and the modality of treatment provided.Conclusion: This study highlighted that one of the limiting factors to implementing the non-rigid immobilization and single visit protocol for buckle fractures as recommended by NICE is likely due to parental wariness and frequent dissatisfaction. This was mostly attributed to soft cast immobilization as patients experienced similar complications as found with rigid immobilization. The authors would rather suggest splint or soft bandage immobilization as this would likely improve patient/parent satisfaction with single visit treatment. With regards to further research, a follow up study can be performed focussing on the physician's preferences with regards to buckle fracture treatment protocol. And to determine what factors from the physician's perspective contributes to the reluctance in implementing the NICE guidelines protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 75
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Abdelhady A, 2018, Ir Med J, V111, P793
  • [2] Home Management Versus Primary Care Physician Follow-up of Patients With Distal Radius Buckle Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Colaco, Keith
    Willan, Andrew
    Stimec, Jennifer
    Barra, Lorena
    Davis, Adrienne
    Howard, Andrew
    Boutis, Kathy
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 77 (02) : 163 - 173
  • [3] Simple treatment for torus fractures of the distal radius
    Davidson, JS
    Brown, DJ
    Barnes, SN
    Bruce, CE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (08): : 1173 - 1175
  • [4] The role of serial radiographs in the management of pediatric torus fractures
    Farbman, KS
    Vinci, RJ
    Cranley, WR
    Creevy, WR
    Bauchner, H
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 1999, 153 (09): : 923 - 925
  • [5] A systematic review of alternative splinting versus complete plaster casts for the management of childhood buckle fractures of the wrist
    Hill, Christopher E.
    Masters, James P. M.
    Perry, Daniel C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2016, 25 (02): : 183 - 190
  • [6] Management of Pediatric Forearm Torus Fractures A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Nan
    Cao, Zhen-hua
    Ma, Yun-fei
    Lin, Zhen
    Yu, Bin
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2016, 32 (11) : 773 - 778
  • [7] Primary Care Physician Follow-up of Distal Radius Buckle Fractures
    Koelink, Eric
    Schuh, Suzanne
    Howard, Andrew
    Stimec, Jennifer
    Barra, Lorena
    Boutis, Kathy
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2016, 137 (01)
  • [8] Are Unnecessary Serial Radiographs Being Ordered in Children with Distal Radius Buckle Fractures?
    Ling, Shi-Neng James
    Cleary, Aidan J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 2018
  • [9] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2022, NICE guideline No. 38
  • [10] Offer of a bandage versus rigid immobilisation in 4-to 15-year-olds with distal radius torus fractures: the FORCE equivalence RCT
    Perry, Daniel C.
    Achten, Juul
    Knight, Ruth
    Dutton, Susan J.
    Dritsaki, Melina
    Mason, James M.
    Appelbe, Duncan E.
    Roland, Damian T.
    Messahel, Shrouk
    Widnall, James
    Gibson, Phoebe
    Preston, Jennifer
    Spoors, Louise M.
    Campolier, Marta
    Costa, Matthew L.
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2022, 26 (33) : 1 - +