Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prenatal Care Utilization at a Public Hospital

被引:6
|
作者
Boguslawski, Shae M. [1 ]
Joseph, Naima T. [2 ]
Stanhope, Kaitlyn K. [1 ]
Ti, Angeline J. [3 ]
Geary, Franklyn H. [4 ]
Boulet, Sheree L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Sch Med, 69 Jesse Hill Jr Dr Southeast,4th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Wellstar Atlanta Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Morehouse Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Atlanta, GA 30310 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COVID-19; prenatal care; telehealth; antenatal screening; UNITED-STATES; ICD-10; CODES; DISPARITIES; PREGNANCY; VALIDATION; PATIENT; VISITS;
D O I
10.1055/a-1877-7951
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study is to compare rates of prenatal care utilization before and after implementation of a telehealth-supplemented prenatal care model due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Study Design Using electronic medical record data, we identified two cohorts of pregnant persons that initiated prenatal care prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic following the implementation of telehealth (from March 1, 2019 through August 31, 2019, and from March 1, 2020, through August 31, 2020, respectively) at Grady Memorial Hospital. We used Pearson's Chi-square and two-tailed t -tests to compare rates of prenatal care utilization, antenatal screening and immunizations, emergency department and obstetric triage visits, and pregnancy complications for the prepandemic versus pandemic-exposed cohorts. Results We identified 1,758 pregnant patients; 965 entered prenatal care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and 793 entered during the pandemic. Patients in the pandemic-exposed cohort were more likely to initiate prenatal care in the first trimester (46.1 vs. 39.0%, p = 0.01), be screened for gestational diabetes (74.4 vs. 67.0%, p <0.001), and receive dating and anatomy ultrasounds (17.8 vs. 13.0%, p = 0.006 and 56.9 vs. 47.3%, p <0.001, respectively) compared with patients in the prepandemic cohort. There was no difference in mean number of prenatal care visits between the two groups (6.9 vs. 7.1, p = 0.18). Approximately 41% of patients in the pandemic-exposed cohort had one or more telehealth visits. The proportion of patients with one or more emergency department visits was higher in the pandemic-exposed cohort than the prepandemic cohort (32.8 vs. 12.3%, p < 0.001). Increases in rates of labor induction were also observed among the pandemic-exposed cohort (47.1 vs. 38.2%, p <0.001). Conclusion Rates of prenatal care utilization were similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, pregnant persons receiving prenatal care during the pandemic entered care earlier and had higher utilization of certain antenatal screening services than those receiving prenatal care prior to the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:1484 / 1494
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on care pathways of lung cancer in Longjumeau hospital
    Bakebe, A.
    Petel, J.
    Awad, M.
    Oliviero, G.
    Decoux, L.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [32] The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hospital Admissions for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
    DiFazio, Louis T.
    Curran, Terrence
    Bilaniuk, Jaroslaw W.
    Adams, John M.
    Durling-Grover, Renay
    Kong, Karen
    Nemeth, Zoltan H.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2020, 86 (08) : 901 - 903
  • [33] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care
    Mike Richards
    Michael Anderson
    Paul Carter
    Benjamin L. Ebert
    Elias Mossialos
    Nature Cancer, 2020, 1 : 565 - 567
  • [34] Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare delivery for lysosomal storage disorders at a tertiary care public hospital in Mumbai
    Muranjan, M.
    Karande, S.
    Rajoria, S.
    JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2024, 70 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [35] The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cleft Care
    Bruce, Madeleine K.
    Pfaff, Miles J.
    Anstadt, Erin E.
    Losee, Joseph E.
    Goldstein, Jesse A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [36] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care
    Huang, Junjie
    Wang, Harry H. X.
    Zheng, Z. J.
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (06) : 427 - 429
  • [37] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care
    Richards, Mike
    Anderson, Michael
    Carter, Paul
    Ebert, Benjamin L.
    Mossialos, Elias
    NATURE CANCER, 2020, 1 (06) : 565 - 567
  • [38] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stroke care
    Alonso de Lecinana, Maria
    HIPERTENSION Y RIESGO VASCULAR, 2021, 38 (04): : 161 - 163
  • [39] Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Dermatology Care in the Chilean Public Health Sector
    Aragon-Caqueo, Diego
    Aedo, Gabriel
    Suarez, Javier
    Toloza, Claudio
    Guglielmetti, Antonio
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (05)
  • [40] Variations in telehealth use for prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic at one hospital system
    Mallampati, Divya
    Talati, Asha N.
    Honart, Anne West
    Johnson, Jasmine D.
    Vladutiu, Catherine
    Menard, Kathryn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S487 - S487