Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prenatal Care Utilization at a Public Hospital

被引:6
|
作者
Boguslawski, Shae M. [1 ]
Joseph, Naima T. [2 ]
Stanhope, Kaitlyn K. [1 ]
Ti, Angeline J. [3 ]
Geary, Franklyn H. [4 ]
Boulet, Sheree L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Sch Med, 69 Jesse Hill Jr Dr Southeast,4th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Wellstar Atlanta Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Morehouse Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Atlanta, GA 30310 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COVID-19; prenatal care; telehealth; antenatal screening; UNITED-STATES; ICD-10; CODES; DISPARITIES; PREGNANCY; VALIDATION; PATIENT; VISITS;
D O I
10.1055/a-1877-7951
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study is to compare rates of prenatal care utilization before and after implementation of a telehealth-supplemented prenatal care model due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Study Design Using electronic medical record data, we identified two cohorts of pregnant persons that initiated prenatal care prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic following the implementation of telehealth (from March 1, 2019 through August 31, 2019, and from March 1, 2020, through August 31, 2020, respectively) at Grady Memorial Hospital. We used Pearson's Chi-square and two-tailed t -tests to compare rates of prenatal care utilization, antenatal screening and immunizations, emergency department and obstetric triage visits, and pregnancy complications for the prepandemic versus pandemic-exposed cohorts. Results We identified 1,758 pregnant patients; 965 entered prenatal care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and 793 entered during the pandemic. Patients in the pandemic-exposed cohort were more likely to initiate prenatal care in the first trimester (46.1 vs. 39.0%, p = 0.01), be screened for gestational diabetes (74.4 vs. 67.0%, p <0.001), and receive dating and anatomy ultrasounds (17.8 vs. 13.0%, p = 0.006 and 56.9 vs. 47.3%, p <0.001, respectively) compared with patients in the prepandemic cohort. There was no difference in mean number of prenatal care visits between the two groups (6.9 vs. 7.1, p = 0.18). Approximately 41% of patients in the pandemic-exposed cohort had one or more telehealth visits. The proportion of patients with one or more emergency department visits was higher in the pandemic-exposed cohort than the prepandemic cohort (32.8 vs. 12.3%, p < 0.001). Increases in rates of labor induction were also observed among the pandemic-exposed cohort (47.1 vs. 38.2%, p <0.001). Conclusion Rates of prenatal care utilization were similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, pregnant persons receiving prenatal care during the pandemic entered care earlier and had higher utilization of certain antenatal screening services than those receiving prenatal care prior to the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:1484 / 1494
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cohorting prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Harris, H. M.
    Dotters-Katz, S. K.
    Wheeler, S.
    Swamy, G. K.
    Hughes, B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (06) : 985 - 985
  • [22] The Differential Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prenatal Care Utilization Among US Women by Medicaid Expansion and Race and Ethnicity
    Lee, Hyunjung
    Singh, Gopal K.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2023, 29 (04): : E137 - E146
  • [23] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on the health care utilization of cancer patients
    Nico Schneider
    Bernhard Strauss
    Jutta Hübner
    Christian Keinki
    Florian Brandt
    Sabine Rubai
    Uwe Altmann
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [24] Impact of Crizanlizumab on Acute Medical Care Utilization in the Height of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Rao, Shivani
    Yun, Nicole K.
    Coggan, James L.
    Wu, Peter
    O'Brien, Teresa
    Barnett, Katherine
    O'Mahony, Sean
    Kaur, Ramandeep
    Bruti, Christopher
    Goetz, Celine
    Martin, Jerome J.
    Gezer, Sefer
    Venugopal, Parameswaran
    Jain, Shivi
    BLOOD, 2021, 138
  • [25] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on the health care utilization of cancer patients
    Schneider, Nico
    Strauss, Bernhard
    Huebner, Jutta
    Keinki, Christian
    Brandt, Florian
    Rubai, Sabine
    Altmann, Uwe
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [26] Impact of telehealth on health care resource utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Arora, Prachi
    Mehta, Darshan
    Ha, Jane
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (05) : 301 - 309
  • [27] IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN ICU AND HOSPITAL RESOURCE UTILIZATION: A CANCER CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Cuenca, John
    Reddy, Dereddi Raja
    Botdorf, Joshua
    Manjappachar, Nirmala
    Hanmandlu, Ankit
    Laserna, Andres
    Wallace, Susannah
    Nates, Joseph
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (01) : 120 - 120
  • [28] IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON CANCER MANAGEMENT IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN PORTUGAL
    Peleteiro, B.
    Severo, M.
    Lamego, J.
    Silvestre, S.
    Alves, S.
    Carvalho, I.
    Azevedo, A.
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2023, 37 : S298 - S298
  • [29] Impact on tuberculosis diagnostic during COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care hospital
    Ruiz-Bastian, Mario
    Diaz-Pollan, Beatriz
    Falces-Romero, Iker
    Toro-Rueda, Carlos
    Garcia-Rodriguez, Julio
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2024, 42 (03): : 135 - 139
  • [30] Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Continuous EEG Utilization
    Zafar, Sahar F.
    Khozein, Rebecca J.
    LaRoche, Suzette M.
    Westover, Michael B.
    Gilmore, Emily J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 39 (07) : 567 - 574