Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prenatal Care Utilization at a Public Hospital

被引:8
作者
Boguslawski, Shae M. [1 ]
Joseph, Naima T. [2 ]
Stanhope, Kaitlyn K. [1 ]
Ti, Angeline J. [3 ]
Geary, Franklyn H. [4 ]
Boulet, Sheree L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Sch Med, 69 Jesse Hill Jr Dr Southeast,4th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Wellstar Atlanta Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Morehouse Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Atlanta, GA 30310 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COVID-19; prenatal care; telehealth; antenatal screening; UNITED-STATES; ICD-10; CODES; DISPARITIES; PREGNANCY; VALIDATION; PATIENT; VISITS;
D O I
10.1055/a-1877-7951
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study is to compare rates of prenatal care utilization before and after implementation of a telehealth-supplemented prenatal care model due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Study Design Using electronic medical record data, we identified two cohorts of pregnant persons that initiated prenatal care prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic following the implementation of telehealth (from March 1, 2019 through August 31, 2019, and from March 1, 2020, through August 31, 2020, respectively) at Grady Memorial Hospital. We used Pearson's Chi-square and two-tailed t -tests to compare rates of prenatal care utilization, antenatal screening and immunizations, emergency department and obstetric triage visits, and pregnancy complications for the prepandemic versus pandemic-exposed cohorts. Results We identified 1,758 pregnant patients; 965 entered prenatal care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and 793 entered during the pandemic. Patients in the pandemic-exposed cohort were more likely to initiate prenatal care in the first trimester (46.1 vs. 39.0%, p = 0.01), be screened for gestational diabetes (74.4 vs. 67.0%, p <0.001), and receive dating and anatomy ultrasounds (17.8 vs. 13.0%, p = 0.006 and 56.9 vs. 47.3%, p <0.001, respectively) compared with patients in the prepandemic cohort. There was no difference in mean number of prenatal care visits between the two groups (6.9 vs. 7.1, p = 0.18). Approximately 41% of patients in the pandemic-exposed cohort had one or more telehealth visits. The proportion of patients with one or more emergency department visits was higher in the pandemic-exposed cohort than the prepandemic cohort (32.8 vs. 12.3%, p < 0.001). Increases in rates of labor induction were also observed among the pandemic-exposed cohort (47.1 vs. 38.2%, p <0.001). Conclusion Rates of prenatal care utilization were similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, pregnant persons receiving prenatal care during the pandemic entered care earlier and had higher utilization of certain antenatal screening services than those receiving prenatal care prior to the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:1484 / 1494
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Update: COVID-19 Pandemic-Associated Changes in Emergency Department Visits - United States, December 2020-January 2021 [J].
Adjemian, Jennifer ;
Hartnett, Kathleen P. ;
Kite-Powell, Aaron ;
DeVies, Jourdan ;
Azondekon, Roseric ;
Radhakrishnan, Lakshmi ;
van Santen, Katharina L. ;
Rodgers, Loren .
MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2021, 70 (15) :552-556
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ENSURING GROWTH TELE, DOI [10.1377/forefront.20200505.591306/full/, DOI 10.1377/FOREFRONT.20200505.591306/FULL]
[3]   Telehealth for High-Risk Pregnancies in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Aziz, Aleha ;
Zork, Noelia ;
Aubey, Janice J. ;
Baptiste, Caitlin D. ;
D'Alton, Mary E. ;
Emeruwa, Ukachi N. ;
Fuchs, Karin M. ;
Goffman, Dena ;
Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia ;
Haythe, Jennifer H. ;
LaSala, Anita P. ;
Madden, Nigel ;
Miller, Eliza C. ;
Miller, Russell S. ;
Monk, Catherine ;
Moroz, Leslie ;
Ona, Samsiya ;
Ring, Laurence E. ;
Sheen, Jean-Ju ;
Spiegel, Erica S. ;
Simpson, Lynn L. ;
Yates, Hope S. ;
Friedman, Alexander M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2020, 37 (08) :800-808
[4]   Telemedicine and healthcare disparities: a cohort study in a large healthcare system in New York City during COVID-19 [J].
Chunara, Rumi ;
Zhao, Yuan ;
Chen, Ji ;
Lawrence, Katharine ;
Testa, Paul A. ;
Nov, Oded ;
Mann, Devin M. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 28 (01) :33-41
[5]   Telehealth Interventions to Improve Obstetric and Gynecologic Health Outcomes A Systematic Review [J].
DeNicola, Nathaniel ;
Grossman, Daniel ;
Marko, Kathryn ;
Sonalkar, Sarita ;
Tobah, Yvonne S. Butler ;
Ganju, Nihar ;
Witkop, Catherine T. ;
Henderson, Jillian T. ;
Butler, Jessica L. ;
Lowery, Curtis .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (02) :371-382
[6]   Multidimensional economic deprivation during the coronavirus pandemic: Early evidence from the United States [J].
Dhongde, Shatakshee .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12)
[7]   Considerations for Obstetric Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Dotters-Katz, Sarah K. ;
Hughes, Brenna L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2020, 37 (08) :773-779
[8]  
Driscoll Anne K, 2020, NCHS Data Brief, P1
[9]   Comparison Between In-Person and Audio-Only Virtual Prenatal Visits and Perinatal Outcomes [J].
Duryea, Elaine L. ;
Adhikari, Emily H. ;
Ambia, Anne ;
Spong, Catherine ;
McIntire, Donald ;
Nelson, David B. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (04)
[10]   Practice Modification for Pandemics A Model for Surge Planning in Obstetrics [J].
Duzyj, Christina M. ;
Thornburg, Loralei L. ;
Han, Christina S. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (02) :237-251