Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prenatal Care Utilization at a Public Hospital

被引:6
|
作者
Boguslawski, Shae M. [1 ]
Joseph, Naima T. [2 ]
Stanhope, Kaitlyn K. [1 ]
Ti, Angeline J. [3 ]
Geary, Franklyn H. [4 ]
Boulet, Sheree L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Sch Med, 69 Jesse Hill Jr Dr Southeast,4th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Wellstar Atlanta Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Morehouse Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Atlanta, GA 30310 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COVID-19; prenatal care; telehealth; antenatal screening; UNITED-STATES; ICD-10; CODES; DISPARITIES; PREGNANCY; VALIDATION; PATIENT; VISITS;
D O I
10.1055/a-1877-7951
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study is to compare rates of prenatal care utilization before and after implementation of a telehealth-supplemented prenatal care model due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Study Design Using electronic medical record data, we identified two cohorts of pregnant persons that initiated prenatal care prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic following the implementation of telehealth (from March 1, 2019 through August 31, 2019, and from March 1, 2020, through August 31, 2020, respectively) at Grady Memorial Hospital. We used Pearson's Chi-square and two-tailed t -tests to compare rates of prenatal care utilization, antenatal screening and immunizations, emergency department and obstetric triage visits, and pregnancy complications for the prepandemic versus pandemic-exposed cohorts. Results We identified 1,758 pregnant patients; 965 entered prenatal care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and 793 entered during the pandemic. Patients in the pandemic-exposed cohort were more likely to initiate prenatal care in the first trimester (46.1 vs. 39.0%, p = 0.01), be screened for gestational diabetes (74.4 vs. 67.0%, p <0.001), and receive dating and anatomy ultrasounds (17.8 vs. 13.0%, p = 0.006 and 56.9 vs. 47.3%, p <0.001, respectively) compared with patients in the prepandemic cohort. There was no difference in mean number of prenatal care visits between the two groups (6.9 vs. 7.1, p = 0.18). Approximately 41% of patients in the pandemic-exposed cohort had one or more telehealth visits. The proportion of patients with one or more emergency department visits was higher in the pandemic-exposed cohort than the prepandemic cohort (32.8 vs. 12.3%, p < 0.001). Increases in rates of labor induction were also observed among the pandemic-exposed cohort (47.1 vs. 38.2%, p <0.001). Conclusion Rates of prenatal care utilization were similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, pregnant persons receiving prenatal care during the pandemic entered care earlier and had higher utilization of certain antenatal screening services than those receiving prenatal care prior to the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:1484 / 1494
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the hospital care of stroke
    Paste-Silva, Joao
    Santos, Tayla Samanta
    Praxedes, Gabriel
    Fialho Silva, Iva Taiuan
    De Abreu, Fernanda Ferreira
    Andrade, Antonio
    Melo, Leonardo
    Souza, Silas
    Mendez, Vinicius
    Jesus, Pedro Antonio
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 429 : 46 - 46
  • [2] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antibiotic utilization in a tertiary hospital
    Demirkiran, Burcu Caliskan
    Gul, Hanefi C.
    Erdem, Hakan
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2024, 18 (08): : 1161 - 1168
  • [3] Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Obstetric Interventions at a Public Hospital
    Johnson, Tatyana A.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Geary, Franklyn H.
    Stanhope, Kaitlyn K.
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2023, 33 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [4] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient postpartum care utilization
    El Helou, Nicole
    Cook, Cassara R.
    Katherine, Nieder
    Carter, Ebony B.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Stout, Molly J.
    Kelly, Jeannie C.
    Raghuraman, Nandini
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S313 - S313
  • [5] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rate of participants with insufficient prenatal care
    Shanahan, Matthew A.
    Burnett, Brian
    Goulding, Alison N.
    Johnson, Grace J.
    Aagaard, Kjersti M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S540 - S540
  • [6] The Impact of Epidemiology on Fertility and Prenatal Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Dionne-Odom, Jodie
    Klipstein, Sigal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 190 (05) : 701 - 706
  • [7] The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Rate of Participants with Insufficient Prenatal Care
    Shanahan, Matthew A.
    Burnett, Brian A.
    Parobek, Christian
    Goulding, Alison N.
    Johnson, Grace J.
    Aagaard, Kjersti M.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2023, 30 : 187A - 188A
  • [8] The COVID-19 pandemic impact on prenatal anxiety
    Nourchene, K.
    Khelifa, E.
    Maatouk, O.
    Ben Aissa, S.
    Abassi, B.
    Bouguerra, I.
    Anissa, B.
    Amdouni, F.
    Mnif, L.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 65 : S522 - S522
  • [9] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a tertiary care public hospital in Singapore: resources and economic costs
    Cai, Y.
    Kwek, S.
    Tang, S. S. L.
    Saffari, S. E.
    Lum, E.
    Yoon, S.
    Ansah, J. P.
    Matchar, D. B.
    Kwa, A. L.
    Ang, K. A.
    Thumboo, J.
    Ong, M. E. H.
    Graves, N.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2022, 121 : 1 - 8
  • [10] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on abortion care utilization and disparities by age
    Fulcher, Isabel R.
    Onwuzurike, Chiamaka
    Goldberg, Alisa B.
    Cottrill, Alischer A.
    Fortin, Jennifer
    Janiak, Elizabeth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (06) : 819.e1 - 819.e15