eHealth literacy in prostate cancer: A systematic review

被引：2

作者：

Jackson, Stuart Robert ^{[1
]}

Yu, Paul ^{[2
]}

Armany, David ^{[2
]}

Occhipinti, Stefano ^{[3
,4
]}

Chambers, Suzanne ^{[5
,6
,7
]}

Leslie, Scott ^{[8
,9
]}

Patel, Manish I. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia

[2] Univ Sydney, Dept Urol, Westmead Hosp, Cnr Hawkesbury Rd,Darcy Rd, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia

[3] Griffith Univ, Sch Appl Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4122, Australia

[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Int Res Ctr Advancement Hlth Commun, Dept English & Commun, Hung Hom,Kowloon, Hong Kong, Angola

[5] Australian Catholic Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, 40 Edward St, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia

[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia

[7] St Vincents Hlth Network Sydney, 390 Victoria St, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia

[8] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, RPA Inst Acad Surg, 145 Missenden Rd, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia

[9] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

来源：

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING | 2024年 / 123卷

关键词：

Prostate; Cancer; Internet; E-health; Literacy; GENDER; INFORMATION; RESOURCES; STRESS; MEN;

D O I：

10.1016/j.pec.2024.108193

中图分类号：

R1 [预防医学、卫生学];

学科分类号：

1004 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

Objective: This systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022226375) aimed to identify the eHealth literacy of men with prostate cancer, and their caregivers. Methods: 8 databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web Of Science, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL) and grey literature sources (e.g. Google Scholar) were searched from inception to December 2023. Articles were included if assessing eHealth/digital literacy of men with prostate cancer, or their carers', and health outcome associations. Formats such as case reports, and review papers were excluded. Records and full texts underwent independent screening and data extraction. Author disagreements were resolved by discussion. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to appraise included literature, with narrative synthesis of results. Results: 21,581 records were retrieved, with 7 articles satisfying inclusion criteria. A heterogenous field was characterised with lack of modern eHealth literacy measurement tools identified. Results suggest novice eHealth literacy using web 1.0 technologies. Non-validated measures of literacy demonstrate mixed results, while health outcome effects limited in scope and reliability. Conclusion: Prostate cancer survivors' eHealth literacy levels is likely novice, and requires further investigation. Practice Implications: Digital technologies/resources implemented as part of patient communication practices should be vetted for quality, and tailored to patients' eHealth literacy abilities and/or needs.

引用

页数：11

共 61 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2018, Microsoft Excel

[2]

[Anonymous], 2015, WORLD POPULATION PRO

[3] Information processing and negative affect: Evidence from the 2003 health information national trends survey [J].