Does Using Highly Porous Tantalum in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduce the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
作者
Mirghaderi, Peyman [1 ,2 ]
Eshraghi, Nasim [1 ]
Sheikhbahaei, Erfan [1 ]
Razzaghof, Mohammadreza [2 ]
Roustai-Geraylow, Kiarash [1 ]
Pouramini, Alireza [1 ]
Eraghi, Mohammad Mirahmadi [1 ]
Kafi, Fatemeh [1 ]
Mortazavi, Sayed Mohammad Javad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Surg Res Soc SRS, Students Sci Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Joint Reconstruct Res Ctr JRRC, Tehran, Iran
来源
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY | 2024年 / 25卷
关键词
Arthroplasty; Hip; Prosthesis-related infections; PJI; Tantalum; TRABECULAR METAL CUP; ACETABULAR BONE LOSS; REPEAT 2-STAGE EXCHANGE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; RETROSPECTIVE COHORT; COMPONENTS REDUCE; PAPROSKY TYPE-3; SEVERE DEFECTS; UNITED-STATES; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2023.101293
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Studies suggest tantalum (Ta) implants may have inherent antibacterial properties. However, there is no consensus regarding the effectiveness of Ta in preventing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Methods: We searched 5 main databases for articles reporting the rate of PJI following rTHA using Ta implants from inception to February 2022. The PJI rates of the Ta group were meta-analyzed, compared with the control group, and represented as relative risks (RRs) in forest plots. Results: We identified 67 eligible studies (28,414 joints) for assessing the prevalence of PJI following rTHA using Ta implants. Among these studies, only 9 compared the Ta implant group with a control group. The overall PJI rate following rTHA using Ta implants was 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2%-3.8%), while it was 5.7% (95% CI = 4.1%-7.8%) if only septic revisions were considered. Comparing the Ta and control groups showed a significantly lower PJI rate following all-cause rTHA with an RR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.65-0.98, P < .05). There was a trend toward lower reinfection rates in the Ta group after rTHA in septic cases, although the difference was not statistically significant (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.44-1.29, P = .30). Conclusions: Ta implants are associated with a lower PJI rate following all-cause rTHA but not after septic causes. Despite positive results, the clinical significance of Ta still remains unclear since the PJI rate was only reduced by 20%.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [81] Early Results of 827 Trabecular Metal Revision Shells in Acetabular Revision
    Skytta, Eerik T.
    Eskelinen, Antti
    Paavolainen, Pekka O.
    Remes, Ville M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (03) : 342 - 345
  • [82] The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects
    Sporer, Scott M.
    Paprosky, Wayne G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (06) : 83 - 86
  • [83] Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity
    Sporer, Scott M.
    Paprosky, Wayne G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (06) : 87 - 90
  • [84] Acetabular Distraction An Alternative for Severe Defects with Chronic Pelvic Discontinuity?
    Sporer, Scott M.
    Bottros, John J.
    Hulst, Jonah B.
    Kancherla, Vamsi K.
    Moric, Mario
    Paprosky, Wayne G.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 470 (11) : 3156 - 3163
  • [85] Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
    Stang, Andreas
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 25 (09) : 603 - 605
  • [86] A single centre study of 41 cases on the use of porous tantalum metal implants in acetabular revision surgery
    Theil, Christoph
    Schmidt-Braekling, Tom
    Gosheger, Georg
    Moellenbeck, Burkhard
    Schwarze, Jan
    Dieckmann, Ralf
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [87] Is tantalum protective against infection in revision total hip arthroplasty?
    Tokarski, A. T.
    Novack, T. A.
    Parvizi, J.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (01) : 45 - 49
  • [88] Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty - Clinical and radiological results of 60 hips
    Unger, AS
    Lewis, RJ
    Gruen, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (08) : 1002 - 1009
  • [89] Acetabular Revisions Using Trabecular Metal Cups and Augments
    Van Kleunen, Jonathan P.
    Lee, Gwo-Chin
    Lementowski, Peter W.
    Nelson, Charles L.
    Garino, Jonathan P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2009, 24 (06) : 64 - 68
  • [90] Comparative survival analysis of porous tantalum and porous titanium acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty
    Vutescu, Emil S.
    Hsiue, Peter
    Paprosky, Wayne
    Nandi, Sumon
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 27 (05) : 505 - 508