Influence of meteorological reanalysis field on air quality modeling in the Yangtze River Delta, China

被引:2
作者
Wang, Xueying [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Zhaobing [3 ]
Xie, Xiaodong [2 ]
Li, Lin [2 ,4 ]
Gong, Kangjia [2 ]
Hu, Jianlin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Atmospher Environm & Equipm, Jiangsu Key Lab Atmospher Environm Monitoring & Po, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Atmospher Environm & Equipm, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Jiangsu Key Lab Atmospher Environm Monitoring & Po, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Univ, Environm Res Inst, Qingdao 266237, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Meteorological reanalysis fields; Yangtze river delta; WRF/CMAQ; Air quality; SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; OZONE POLLUTION; SIMULATION; EMISSIONS; IMPACT; REGION; SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE; POLLUTANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120231
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The meteorological reanalysis field is one of the key inputs to drive mesoscale meteorology simulations. To investigate the impacts of different reanalysis data on predictions of the meteorology parameters, as well as predictions of air quality, this study utilized the Weather Research and Forecasting/Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system (WRF/CMAQ) with two sets of meteorological reanalysis inputs, the NCEP Final Operational Global Analysis (FNL) and the ECMWF Reanalysis v5.0 (ERA5) to predict the concentrations of ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) in 2018. The results showed that ERA5 outperformed FNL in simulating 2-m temperature and relative humidity, while FNL demonstrated better accuracy in predicting wind fields. Both FNL and ERA5 underestimated the PM2.5 in spring and summer while overestimating it in autumn and winter. Furthermore, the Normalized mean bias (NMB) value for ERA5 exceeded the standard in winter (0.34), and the Normalized mean error (NME) value exceeded the standard in autumn (0.54). Both FNL and ERA5 underestimated the PM2.5 concentration during the pollution episodes, and FNL's simulations of PM2.5 concentrations were closer to observations than ERA5's as pollution levels intensified. Regarding O3 concentrations, ERA5 exhibited better performance than FNL, with the NMB (0.30, 0.27) and NME (0.39, 0.37) of FNL and ERA5 both exceeding the standard only in wintertime.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Bai f., 2013, Comput. Technol. Autom., V32, P141
  • [2] Comparative analysis of meteorological performance of coupled chemistry-meteorology models in the context of AQMEII phase 2
    Brunner, Dominik
    Savage, Nicholas
    Jorba, Oriol
    Eder, Brian
    Giordano, Lea
    Badia, Alba
    Balzarini, Alessandra
    Baro, Rocio
    Bianconi, Roberto
    Chemel, Charles
    Curci, Gabriele
    Forkel, Renate
    Jimenez-Guerrero, Pedro
    Hirtl, Marcus
    Hodzic, Alma
    Honzak, Luka
    Im, Ulas
    Knote, Christoph
    Makar, Paul
    Manders-Groot, Astrid
    van Meijgaard, Erik
    Neal, Lucy
    Perez, Juan L.
    Pirovano, Guido
    San Jose, Roberto
    Schroeder, Wolfram
    Sokhi, Ranjeet S.
    Syrakov, Dimiter
    Torian, Alfreida
    Tuccella, Paolo
    Werhahn, Johannes
    Wolke, Ralf
    Yahya, Khairunnisa
    Zabkar, Rahela
    Zhang, Yang
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Galmarini, Stefano
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 115 : 470 - 498
  • [3] Development of revised SAPRC aromatics mechanisms
    Carter, William P. L.
    Heo, Gookyoung
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 77 : 404 - 414
  • [4] Offshore wind energy resource simulation forced by different reanalyses: Comparison with observed data in the Iberian Peninsula
    Carvalho, D.
    Rocha, A.
    Gomez-Gesteira, M.
    Santos, C. Silva
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 134 : 57 - 64
  • [5] A neural network based ensemble approach for improving the accuracy of meteorological fields used for regional air quality modeling
    Cheng, Shuiyuan
    Li, Li
    Chen, Dongsheng
    Li, Jianbing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 112 : 404 - 414
  • [6] Emery C.A., 2001, ENHANCED METEOROLOGI
  • [7] Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical model performance
    Emery, Christopher
    Liu, Zhen
    Russell, Armistead G.
    Odman, M. Talat
    Yarwood, Greg
    Kumar, Naresh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2017, 67 (05) : 582 - 598
  • [8] Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of laboratory, field and model studies
    Ervens, B.
    Turpin, B. J.
    Weber, R. J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2011, 11 (21) : 11069 - 11102
  • [9] A comprehensive analysis of the spatio-temporal variation of urban air pollution in China during 2014-2018
    Fan, Hao
    Zhao, Chuanfeng
    Yang, Yikun
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 220
  • [10] Fu X., 2019, Environ. Prot. Sci., V45, P64