Machine Learning Model for the Evaluation of Biomethane Potential Based on the Biochemical Composition of Biomass

被引:13
作者
Adeleke, Adekunle A. [1 ]
Okolie, Jude A. [2 ]
Ogbaga, Chukwuma C.
Ikubanni, Peter P. [3 ]
Okoye, Patrick U. [4 ]
Akande, Olugbenga [5 ]
机构
[1] Nile Univ Nigeria, Dept Mech Engn, FCT, Abuja, Nigeria
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Gallogly Coll Engn, Engn Pathways, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] Landmark Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Omu Aran, Nigeria
[4] Inst Energias Renovables IER UNAM, Privada Xochicalco Temixco s-n Col Ctr, Morelos 62580, Mexico
[5] Handong Global Univ, Dept Adv Convergence, 558 Handong Ro, Pohang 37554, South Korea
关键词
Biogas; Cellulose; Hemicellulose; Lignin; Machine learning; Anaerobic digestion; METHANE PRODUCTION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; DIGESTION PROCESS; BIODEGRADABILITY; LIGNIN; MAIZE; YIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s12155-023-10681-9
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Biomethane potential (BMP) is often used to evaluate the biogas potential during anaerobic digestion (AD). However, BMP tests are complex and time-consuming. Therefore, the present study presents a hybrid model in machine learning (ML) for evaluating and predicting BMP based on biomass biochemical composition. Generative adversarial network (GAN) is combined with different ML models to model and predict BMP for different biomass materials. The models were trained on 64 experimental datasets (original datasets) and a combination of a GAN and the original datasets (augmented datasets). The gradient boost regression (GBR) model performed very well on the training set with both datasets compared to the support vector machine (SVM), Artificial neural network (ANN), and random forest (RF). RF and GBR models performed very well when trained with the combined GAN and original datasets, with RF slightly outperforming GBR on the test datasets (R2 score of 0.9106 vs. 0.9177). This indicates that the models benefit from the additional data generated by the GAN. The GBR model trained with the GAN and original datasets combined outperformed the RF model on the test set, with an R2 score of 0.9177 vs. 0.9106. A comparison between three different hyperparameter optimization methods (grid search, particle swarm optimization, and Bayesian optimization) showed that the grid search optimized model offers a balanced performance with an R2 score of 0.9994 and a marginal improvement on the test set with an R2 of 0.9213. Feature analysis results demonstrate that cellulose has the most influence on BMP.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 743
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Adekunle K. F., 2015, Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, V6, P205, DOI 10.4236/abb.2015.63020
[2]   Data-Driven Machine Learning Approach for Predicting the Higher Heating Value of Different Biomass Classes [J].
Afolabi, Inioluwa Christianah ;
Epelle, Emmanuel, I ;
Gunes, Burcu ;
Gulec, Fatih ;
Okolie, Jude A. .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 4 (04) :1227-1241
[3]   Modeling pseudo-second-order kinetics of orange peel-paracetamol adsorption process using artificial neural network [J].
Afolabi, Inioluwa Christianah ;
Popoola, Segun Isaiah ;
Bello, Olugbenga Solomon .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2020, 203
[4]   Machine learning applications in biomass pyrolysis: From biorefinery to end-of-life product management [J].
Akinpelu, David Akorede ;
Adekoya, Oluwaseun A. ;
Oladoye, Peter Olusakin ;
Ogbaga, Chukwuma C. ;
Okolie, Jude A. .
DIGITAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 8
[5]   Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure - Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield [J].
Amon, Thomas ;
Amon, Barbara ;
Kryvoruchko, Vitaliy ;
Zollitsch, Werner ;
Mayer, Karl ;
Gruber, Leonhard .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) :173-182
[6]   Interpretable machine learning to model biomass and waste gasification [J].
Ascher, Simon ;
Wang, Xiaonan ;
Watson, Ian ;
Sloan, William ;
You, Siming .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 364
[7]   Can Biomethane Potential (BMP) Be Predicted from Other Variables Such As Biochemical Composition in Lignocellulosic Biomass and Related Organic Residues? [J].
Bayard, Remy ;
Liu, Xun ;
Benbelkacem, Hassen ;
Buffiere, Pierre ;
Gourdon, Remy .
BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (02) :610-623
[8]   Exploring the Possibility to Shorten the Duration and Reduce the Number of Replicates in Biomethane Potential Tests (BMP) [J].
Calabro, Paolo Salvatore ;
Folino, Adele ;
Maesano, Mariangela ;
Pangallo, Domenica ;
Zema, Demetrio Antonio .
WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2023, 14 (08) :2481-2493
[9]   Neural network model for predicting the biomethane yield in an anaerobic digester using biomass composition profiles [J].
Dominguillo-Ramirez, Diana ;
Aburto, Jorge ;
Leon-Santiesteban, Hector Hugo ;
Martinez-Hernandez, Elias .
FUEL, 2023, 344
[10]   Machine learning prediction of pyrolytic products of lignocellulosic biomass based on physicochemical characteristics and pyrolysis conditions [J].
Dong, Zixun ;
Bai, Xiaopeng ;
Xu, Daochun ;
Li, Wenbin .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 367