Technology selection and ranking: Literature review and current applications in oil & gas industry

被引:4
作者
Araujo, Lavinia Maria Mendes [1 ,2 ]
Maior, Caio Bezerra Souto [1 ,3 ]
Lins, Isis Didier [1 ,2 ]
Moura, Marcio Jose das Chagas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Risk Anal Reliabil Engn & Environm Modeling CE, BR-50740550 Recife, PE, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Dept Prod Engn, BR-50740550 Recife, PE, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Technol Ctr, BR-55014900 Caruaru, PE, Brazil
来源
GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING | 2023年 / 226卷
关键词
Technology selection; Technology ranking; Oil and gas industry; Research and development; PROJECT PORTFOLIO SELECTION; NETWORK MODEL; MANAGEMENT; PRIORITIZATION; METHODOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTION; INNOVATION; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211771
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Investments and projects developed in the Oil and Gas (O & G) industry involve complex equipment, infrastructure, and processes. Additionally, Research and Development (R & D) activities play an important role in competitive potential and productivity growth in which scenarios may involve more than one option of projects to be accomplished. A solid and reliable background for decision-making is fundamental to the strategic level using well-structured methods to support their selection or classification as many criteria must be taken into consideration. Since precise data is scarce, it is necessary to understand how to measure the criteria. This paper develops a systematic literature review to investigate the methodologies currently used for selecting and/or ranking projects, especially regarding new technologies that can significantly support companies' decisionmaking processes in the O & G sector. The main paper contributions include mapping selection/ranking methods, application areas, already applied criteria, and a research agenda. We searched for articles on this topic in the specific area of O & G, and then we expanded to general areas, resulting in 29 articles in total. The bibliometric data shows Engineering and Management as the most prominent areas in this subject. When focusing on O & G, we highlight the applied methodologies for decision-making in ranking technologies, such as mathematical programming, artificial intelligence, and decision theory. In addition, we report the main criteria employed to evaluate the projects and gaps concerning the selection of new technologies, such as the absence of equipment reliability as a factor. As the number of studies in the O & G field is small, applications mainly in the R & D domain are encouraged. In this sense, the research agenda suggests a wide range of possibilities when combining methods and exploring criteria such as risk and reliability.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [61] Portfolio selection of distributed energy generation projects considering uncertainty and project interaction under different enterprise strategic scenarios
    Wu, Yunna
    Xu, Chuanbo
    Ke, Yiming
    Li, Xinying
    Li, Lingwenying
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 236 : 444 - 464
  • [62] Evaluating the Performance of Oil and Gas Companies by an Extended Balanced Scorecard and the Hesitant Fuzzy Best-Worst Method
    Yazdi, Amir Karbassi
    Mehdiabadi, Amir
    Hanne, Thomas
    Sarfaraz, Amir Homayoun
    Yazdian, Fatemeh Tabatabaei
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [63] R&R study of using a stress wave timer to measure the elastic modulus of structural dimension lumber
    Yu, Yabin
    Liu, Ying
    Gong, Meng
    Xu, Zhaojun
    Fang, Youpan
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2017, 95 : 293 - 296
  • [64] Project Evaluation and Selection with Task Failures
    Zhao, Wenhui
    Hall, Nicholas G.
    Liu, Zhixin
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 29 (02) : 428 - 446
  • [65] Deep learning algorithms for rotating machinery intelligent diagnosis: An open source benchmark study
    Zhao, Zhibin
    Li, Tianfu
    Wu, Jingyao
    Sun, Chuang
    Wang, Shibin
    Yan, Ruqiang
    Chen, Xuefeng
    [J]. ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2020, 107 : 224 - 255