Studying open government data: Acknowledging practices and politics

被引:2
作者
van Maanen, Gijs [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Molengraaff Inst Private Law, Fac Law Econ & Governance, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
DATA & POLICY | 2023年 / 5卷
基金
荷兰研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
methodology; open government data; open government; political ontology; science and technology studies; TRANSPARENCY;
D O I
10.1017/dap.2022.40
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Open government and open data are often presented as the Asterix and Obelix of modern government-one cannot discuss one, without involving the other. Modern government, in this narrative, should open itself up, be more transparent, and allow the governed to have a say in their governance. The usage of technologies, and especially the communication of governmental data, is then thought to be one of the crucial instruments helping governments achieving these goals. Much open government data research, hence, focuses on the publication of open government data, their reuse, and re-users. Recent research trends, by contrast, divert from this focus on data and emphasize the importance of studying open government data in practice, in interaction with practitioners, while simultaneously paying attention to their political character. This commentary looks more closely at the implications of emphasizing the practical and political dimensions of open government data. It argues that researchers should explicate how and in what way open government data policies present solutions to what kind of problems. Such explications should be based on a detailed empirical analysis of how different actors do or do not do open data. The key question to be continuously asked and answered when studying and implementing open government data is how the solutions openness present latch onto the problem they aim to solve.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Amoore Louise, 2020, Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others
[2]   Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability [J].
Ananny, Mike ;
Crawford, Kate .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2018, 20 (03) :973-989
[3]  
Antal ArianeBerthoin., 2015, Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance
[4]   Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows [J].
Bates, Jo ;
Lin, Yu-Wei ;
Goodale, Paula .
BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2016, 3 (02) :1-12
[5]  
Bowen JR, 2021, Pragmatic inquiry: Critical concepts for social sciences
[6]  
Bueger C., 2018, International Practice Theory
[7]  
Cavarero A, 2004, What is political theory?, P54, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446215425.N4
[8]  
Currie M.E., 2016, The Data-fication of Openness - The Practices and Policies of Open Government Data in Los Angeles
[9]   Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach [J].
Dawes, Sharon S. ;
Vidiasova, Lyudmila ;
Parkhimovich, Olga .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 33 (01) :15-27
[10]   What is political in sub-politics?: How Aristotle might help STS [J].
de Vries, Gerard .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2007, 37 (05) :781-809