Does interdisciplinarity attract more social media attention?

被引:1
作者
Chen, Shiji [1 ,3 ]
Ren, Xuyan [2 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Chinese Acad Sci & Educ Evaluat CASEE, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Chinese Acad Sci & Educ Evaluat CASEE, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Facebook; interdisciplinarity; Mendeley; social media; Twitter; DIVERSITY; IMPACT; CITATION; SCIENCE; ALTMETRICS; INNOVATION; JOURNALS; RANKINGS; VARIETY; METRICS;
D O I
10.1177/01655515231202762
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The impact of interdisciplinarity is a popular research topic, but most studies on this subject focus mainly on scientific impact. In recent years, social media platforms have become useful tools for assessing broader effects beyond scientific or academic impacts. Thus, exploring the effect of interdisciplinarity on social media platforms may yield interesting results. In order to examine the relationship between interdisciplinarity and social media attention, we analysed all publications in the Scopus database for the years 2018 and 2019. Three social media platforms with the highest coverage of research articles, Mendeley, Twitter and Facebook, and three common interdisciplinarity indicators, Leinster-Cobbold diversity indices (LCDiv), Rao-Stirling diversity (RS) and DIV, were applied to cross-validate our findings. It appears that interdisciplinarity does increase social media attention on Mendeley, Twitter and Facebook alike. The results indicate that interdisciplinary research indeed can attract more social media attention.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient [J].
Ahlgren, P ;
Jarneving, B ;
Rousseau, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 54 (06) :550-560
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Incentives Performance: Governance Res Organizations, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09785-516
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, FAC INT RES
[4]  
Archambault É, 2011, PRO INT CONF SCI INF, P66
[5]   Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Haunschild, Robin .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (05)
[6]   Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 103 (03) :1123-1144
[7]   Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2014, 8 (04) :895-903
[8]   What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (02) :217-233
[9]  
Boyack K., 2014, 19 INT C SCI TECHN I, P64
[10]   Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success [J].
Bromham, Lindell ;
Dinnage, Russell ;
Hua, Xia .
NATURE, 2016, 534 (7609) :684-+