Wasting CO2 and the Clean Development Mechanism: The remarkable success of a climate failure

被引:3
作者
Ernstson, Henrik [1 ,3 ]
Swyngedouw, Erik [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, KTH Royal Inst Technol, Manchester, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester, England
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn, Teknikringen 10B, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Clean Development Mechanism; urban waste; neoliberal natures; ecological modernization; South Africa; CARBON MARKETS; POLITICAL ECOLOGY; ECONOMY; FINANCE; ACCUMULATION; RETHINKING; PROJECTS; ENERGY; CDM;
D O I
10.1177/25148486231196677
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines how global climate mitigation policies articulate with urban political-ecological transformations. It focuses on South African waste-to-value projects as case studies, exploring how local processes of urban ecological modernization combine with global climate finance through the now largely defunct Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Whilst it is generally recognized that waste-related CDM projects in South Africa (and elsewhere) have been an unmitigated failure in terms of climate and socio-economic benefits, we demonstrate that landfill-to-gas/energy projects have functioned effectively as geographical-discursive dispositifs through which particular knowledge systems are enrolled, specific 'solutions' are projected, and singular imaginaries of what is possible and desirable foregrounded, thereby crowding out alternative possibilities. This not only nurtures the commodification and marketization of non-human matter with an eye towards sustaining capital accumulation but, rather more importantly, successfully installs state-orchestrated private property relations around common resources, thereby deepening the dispossessing socio-ecological relations upon which expanded capitalist reproduction rests. We argue that whilst the formal outcome of the CDM is a failure, its success resides precisely in how it permitted local and global elites to create administrative and regulatory practices that solidify and naturalize a neoliberal market-based framework to approach the climate crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 680
页数:27
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [1] The inconvenient truth of carbon offsets
    Anderson, Kevin
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 484 (7392) : 7 - 7
  • [2] Andreucci D., 2017, Capitalism Nature Socialism, V28, P28, DOI [10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027, DOI 10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, Sustainable energy solutions for South African local government: a practical guide
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, WAST CLIM CHANG GLOB
  • [5] Reviewing 15 years of research on neoliberal conservation: Towards a decolonial, interdisciplinary, intersectional and community-engaged research agenda
    Apostolopoulou, Elia
    Chatzimentor, Anastasia
    Maestre-Andres, Sara
    Requena-I-Mora, Marina
    Pizarro, Alejandra
    Bormpoudakis, Dimitrios
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2021, 124 : 236 - 256
  • [6] Bhailall S., 2015, THESIS U WITWATERSRA
  • [7] Getting soaked? Climate crisis, adaptation finance, and racialized austerity
    Bigger, Patrick
    Millington, Nate
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING E-NATURE AND SPACE, 2020, 3 (03) : 601 - 623
  • [8] Greening Capitalism? A Marxist Critique of Carbon Markets
    Boehm, Steffen
    Misoczky, Maria Ceci
    Moog, Sandra
    [J]. ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2012, 33 (11) : 1617 - 1638
  • [9] Bond P., 2012, MONDE DIPLOMATIQUE
  • [10] Bond P., 2005, Trouble in the air: global warming and the privatised atmosphere