共 30 条
Mixed Methods Evaluation of Two Georgia College Campus Support Programs for Students with Experience in Foster Care
被引:3
|作者:
Collins, Ciara M.
[1
]
Salazar, Amy M.
[2
]
Hoffman-Cooper, Angela
[3
]
Johnson, Royel M.
[4
]
Schmidt, Linda
[5
]
Tiller, Lori
[6
]
Young, Sarah
[7
]
机构:
[1] Abt Associates Inc, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
[2] Washington State Univ Vancouver, Dept Human Dev, Vancouver, WA USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Rossier Sch Educ, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Western Michigan Univ, Sch Social Work, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[6] Univ Georgia, JW Fanning Inst Leadership Dev, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[7] Kennesaw State Univ, Sch Govt & Int Affairs, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
关键词:
Foster care;
Campus support programs;
Program evaluation;
Transition age youth;
COVID-19;
Seven life domains;
ALUMNI;
EDUCATION;
YOUTH;
STRENGTHS;
OUTCOMES;
D O I:
10.1007/s10560-023-00941-0
中图分类号:
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号:
1204 ;
摘要:
A large and growing number of colleges and universities have invested in the development of campus support programs (CSPs) that specifically aim to support students with experience in foster care (SEFC). However, the evidence base for CSPs remains quite limited. The current study seeks to contribute to the literature with a mixed methods evaluation of two CSPs in Georgia, one at a 2-year technical college and one at a 4-year university. Qualitative data were collected by the study team via student and staff interviews. Quantitative data were provided by CSP program staff and included program implementation and administrative outcome data (i.e., grade-point average, course credit completion) for SEFC who participated in the CSP. Outcome data were also provided for comparison student groups: (a) all undergraduate students, (b) all first-generation undergraduate students, and (c) all undergraduate students who checked "Ward of the court" on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. Analyses revealed that the two CSPs in this study offer important supports to SEFC, but many barriers stand in the way of services reaching their full potential. Most of the university students interviewed shared positive experiences of the CSP, but many suggested improvements were offered as well. Administrative data showed the promise of CSPs, with SEFC performing similar to or better than some of their peers academically; however, the study design and data limitations prevent this study from making efficacy claims. Policy and practice recommendations are provided, as well as how researchers can work alongside CSPs to conduct program evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 218
页数:22
相关论文