Does gradeless learning affect students' academic performance? A study of effects over time

被引:5
作者
Kjaergaard, Annemette [1 ,4 ]
Buhl-Wiggers, Julie [2 ]
Mikkelsen, Elisabeth Naima [3 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Management Soc & Commun, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Econ, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Org, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[4] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Management Soc & Commun, Dalgas Have 15, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
Gradeless learning; academic performance; higher education; student well-being; motivation; learning approach; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; MARKING; STRESS; IMPACT; SCALE; GAP;
D O I
10.1080/03075079.2023.2233007
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Many have suggested that performance grading may be a factor in the increasing number of students reporting having mental health issues, including feelings of stress. Gradeless learning has been shown to ease the pressure on students because it encourages a focus on learning rather than performance. Indeed, gradeless learning has been documented to benefit well-being, stress reduction, motivation, and learning approach, but its influence on academic performance requires more investigation. Drawing on a quantitative analysis, we empirically examine the effect of gradeless learning on a broad set of outcomes including well-being and stress, but focus specifically on students' later academic performance as measured by grades. Our findings reveal that gradeless learning can increase motivation and reduce surface learning but has no significant effect on students' later academic achievements. The study concludes that gradeless learning can provide a relevant alternative to grades if carefully designed.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 350
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Student perspectives on assessment: Experience in a competency-based portfolio system [J].
Altahawi, Faysal ;
Sisk, Bryan ;
Poloskey, Stacey ;
Hicks, Caitlin ;
Dannefer, Elaine F. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (03) :221-225
[2]   Applying stress theory to higher education: lessons from a study of first-year students [J].
Amirkhan, James H. ;
Bowers, Graham K. ;
Logan, Christina .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (11) :2231-2244
[3]   Gender gaps in different grading systems [J].
Angelo, Catarina ;
Reis, Ana Balcao .
EDUCATION ECONOMICS, 2021, 29 (01) :105-119
[4]   Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity in Graded and Ungraded Writing [J].
Armstrong, Kimberly M. .
FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2010, 43 (04) :690-702
[5]   Grades as Money and the Role of the Market Metaphor in Management Education [J].
Beatty, Joy E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2004, 3 (02) :187-196
[6]   The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J].
Biggs, J ;
Kember, D ;
Leung, DYP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 71 :133-149
[7]   A Change to Pass/Fail Grading in the First Two Years at One Medical School Results in Improved Psychological Well-Being [J].
Bloodgood, Robert A. ;
Short, Jerry G. ;
Jackson, John M. ;
Martindale, James R. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2009, 84 (05) :655-662
[8]  
Brilleslyper J., 2012, Primus, V22, P411, DOI DOI 10.1080/10511970.2011.571346
[9]  
Brookhart S.M., 2004, Grading