Ductile fracture toughness of Al 5754-H111 alloy using essential work of fracture method

被引:7
作者
Abdellah, Mohammed Y. [1 ,2 ]
Ghazaly, Nouby M. [1 ]
Kamal, Al-Shimaa H. [1 ]
Seleem, Abo-El Hagag A. [3 ]
Abdel-Jaber, G. T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] South Valley Univ, Fac Engn, Mech Engn Dept, Qena 83523, Egypt
[2] Umm Al Qura Univ Makkah, Coll Engn & Islamic Architecture, Mech Engn Dept, Meccah, Saudi Arabia
[3] Sun Miser Petr Co, Cairo, Egypt
[4] New Assiut Univ Technol NATU, Assiut, Egypt
关键词
EWF; aluminium alloy; tensile strength; fracture toughness; GROWTH; RECRYSTALLIZATION; DEFORMATION; MECHANISM; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.3934/matersci.2023020
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The aluminium alloy 5754 H-111 is a high-strength alloy with a remarkable corrosion resistance, particularly to seawater. It is widely used in the aerospace, marine, and automotive industries. In this work, the influence of fracture toughness methods applied to two thin aluminium sheets with different thicknesses (1.8 mm and 5 mm) was analysed. The first method was the essential work of fracture (EWF) method. It was applied at room temperature at a deformation rate of 1 mm/min with a double-edge notched tensile specimen (DENT) to measure the fracture toughness (w(e)) of a material with ductile damage based on the stored energy of the body. The second method was a compact tensile test (CT) to determine the linear elastic fracture toughness. For the EWF, DENTs of 4, 6, 10, 12, and 14 mm were used in the centre section. The EWF values were 273 kJ/m(2) and 63 kJ/m(2) for the aluminium sheets with thicknesses of 5 mm and 1.8 mm, respectively. The surface energies JIC determined using CT were 34.5 kJ/m(2) and 10.6 kJ/m(2), respectively, for these sheets. These values are highly similar. Furthermore, the percentage errors of the elastic EWF were 5.8% and 8.4%, respectively, for the two thicknesses. The fractures were of the stress types in which the pits and voids grow in conjunction. In addition, both deep and isolated large dimples were well distributed in the aluminium, which is the main ductile deformation concept.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 389
页数:20
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]  
Hassan M. K., 2017, AM J MECH ENG, V5, P234, DOI DOI 10.12691/AJME-5-5-7
[32]   Study on the fluidity, mechanical and fracture behavior of ABS/TPU/CNT nanocomposites [J].
Heidari, Farshad ;
Aghalari, Milad ;
Chalabi Tehran, Ata ;
Shelesh-Nezhad, Karim .
JOURNAL OF THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2021, 34 (08) :1037-1051
[33]   EVALUATION OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS IN DUCTILE CAST-IRON [J].
KOBAYASHI, T ;
YAMADA, S .
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A-PHYSICAL METALLURGY AND MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1994, 25 (11) :2427-2437
[34]   Determination of essential work of necking and tearing from a single tensile test [J].
Korsunsky, AM ;
Kim, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2005, 132 (03) :L37-L44
[35]   Deformation mechanism under essential work of fracture process in polycyclo-olefin materials [J].
Kuno, T. ;
Yamagishi, Y. ;
Kawamura, T. ;
Nitta, K. .
EXPRESS POLYMER LETTERS, 2008, 2 (06) :404-412
[36]   Relationship between crack growth resistance curves and critical CTOA [J].
Lu, Longkun ;
Wang, Shengnan .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2017, 173 :146-156
[37]   ESSENTIAL WORK OF FRACTURE AND J-INTEGRAL MEASUREMENTS FOR DUCTILE POLYMERS [J].
MAI, YW ;
POWELL, P .
JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART B-POLYMER PHYSICS, 1991, 29 (07) :785-793
[38]   ON THE ESSENTIAL WORK OF DUCTILE FRACTURE IN POLYMERS [J].
MAI, YW ;
COTTERELL, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 1986, 32 (02) :105-125
[39]   Effect of Specimen Thickness and Stress Intensity Factor Range on Plasticity-Induced Fatigue Crack Closure in A7075-T6 Alloy [J].
Masuda, Kenichi ;
Ishihara, Sotomi ;
Oguma, Noriyasu .
MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (03) :1-16
[40]   Effect of stacking sequence and geometric scaling on the brittleness number of glass fiber composite laminate with stress raiser [J].
Mohammed, Y. ;
Hassan, Mohamed K. ;
Abu El-Ainin, H. ;
Hashem, A. M. .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2014, 21 (02) :281-288