The effects of dynamic prompt and background transparency of hover feedback design on the user interface of shopping websites

被引:5
作者
Chen, Chien-Hsiung [1 ]
Zhai, Weimin [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Design, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Shopping website; Mouse hover; Dynamic prompt; Degree of transparency; Subjective evaluation; ATTENTION; QUALITY; FLICKER; PERCEPTIONS; INTENTION;
D O I
10.1108/APJML-11-2021-0821
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The implementation of interaction design concepts to facilitate communication between users and shopping websites has gained increasing attention in recent years. Mouse hover is a vital interaction method for users to access shopping sites and significantly impacts their decision-making experience. A well-designed mouse hover function can effectively enhance the user's search performance and improve the user experience. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the dynamic prompt designs at the hover position and the degree of feedback transparency may affect the user's task performance and personal feelings when operating the hover function on the shopping website. Design/methodology/approach The study employed two independent variables in the experiments: dynamic prompt and background transparency of hover feedback. A between-subject design of 2 (single flicker and continuous flicker) x 3 (transparency at 0%, 25%, and 50%) was adopted in the experiment. A total of 60 participants were invited to participate in the experiment using the purposive sampling method. Participants were asked to complete four operation tasks, and the time of each was recorded. They were then asked to complete the system usability scale (SUS) questionnaire and conduct subjective evaluations before they were briefly interviewed. Findings The generated results revealed that: (1) In the interaction with a shopping website, the degree of background transparency of hover feedback affected the participants' task performance. (2) The effect of a single flicker had significantly higher subjective evaluation results regarding the degree of rationality compared with a continuous flicker. (3) The participants' perceptions of the information clarity were affected when the background transparency of hover feedback was 50%. (4) The effect of a continuous flicker was better than that of a single flicker when the background transparency of hover feedback was 25%. The participants' attraction to a continuous flicker was significantly higher than that of a single flicker. Nonetheless, when the degree of background transparency was at 0% or 50%, the results were the opposite. Originality/value The findings generated from the research can be a reference for the development of hover operation in the user interface design for shopping websites.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 827
页数:19
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Aggarwal, 2020, INT J PUBLIC SECTOR, V6, P605
  • [2] How website quality affects online impulse buying Moderating effects of sales promotion and credit card use
    Akram, Umair
    Hui, Peng
    Khan, Muhammad Kaleem
    Tanveer, Yasir
    Mehmood, Khalid
    Ahmad, Wasim
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2018, 30 (01) : 235 - 256
  • [3] Profile-Based Summarisation for Web Site Navigation
    Alhindi, Azhar
    Kruschwitz, Udo
    Fox, Chris
    Albakour, M-Dyaa
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 33 (01) : 4
  • [4] The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations
    Amadieu, Franck
    Marine, Claudette
    Laimay, Carole
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [5] Baudisch P., 2004, P SIGCHI C HUMAN FAC, P367
  • [6] Attention-capturing properties of high frequency luminance flicker: Implications for brake light conspicuity
    Berg, William P.
    Berglund, Eric D.
    Strang, Adam J.
    Baum, Matthew J.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2007, 10 (01) : 22 - 32
  • [7] Betrancourt M., 1998, HYPERTEXTES HYPERMED, P157
  • [8] Bier E.A., 1995, READINGS HUMAN COMPU, P517
  • [9] Brooke J., 1986, System usability scale (SUS): a quick-and-dirty method of system evaluation user information, V43, P1
  • [10] Chen, 2020, J SCI DESIGN, V4, P19