Operative Autonomy in a Gender-Balanced Cohort of Surgical Trainees

Background:Gender inequity continues to be a major focus of improvements within surgical education. Female trainees are fewer and experience reduced quality of surgical training. Prior studies have demonstrated that surgical autonomy for female trainees in a range of surgical disciplines is less than that of male trainees. As a unique example among Australasian specialty training boards, the New Zealand Board of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery has boasted a gender-balanced cohort of surgical trainees since 2013. The authors sought to examine the effect of gender on surgical autonomy in a cohort of trainees where gender balance has been achieved.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was undertaken. Anonymized logbook data for New Zealand plastic surgery trainees were analyzed, for the study period, consisting of rotations from December of 2013 to June of 2020. Self-reported levels of trainee supervision were compared against gender. Outcomes were tested using multivariate analysis.Results:Thirty-eight trainees were included in the study (58% female), with a total of 81,178 cases recorded over the 6.5-year study period. No overall statistically significant difference in surgical autonomy was identified when analyzed by gender. Male and female trainees showed similar trends of increasing surgical autonomy throughout the course of surgical training.Conclusions:In a cohort of surgical trainees that has reached gender balance, the negative impact of gender on surgical autonomy was not identified. These findings suggest that where women make up an equal proportion of trainees, the implicit gender bias within surgical training may be ameliorated.