High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Le Pape, Sylvain [1 ,2 ]
Savart, Sigourney [1 ]
Arrive, Francois [1 ]
Frat, Jean-Pierre [1 ,2 ]
Ragot, Stephanie [2 ]
Coudroy, Remi [1 ,2 ]
Thille, Arnaud W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Poitiers, Med Intens Reanimat, 2 Rue Miletrie, F-86021 Poitiers, France
[2] Univ Poitiers, INSERM, CIC 1402, IS ALIVE Res Grp, Poitiers, France
关键词
COVID19; High-flow nasal cannula therapy; Conventional oxygen therapy; Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure; Intubation; Mortality; MORTALITY; VENTILATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13613-023-01208-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 remains uncertain. We aimed at assessing whether HFNC is associated with reduced risk of intubation or mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT).MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing HFNC vs. COT in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, published in English from inception to December 2022. Pediatric studies, studies that compared HFNC with a noninvasive respiratory support other than COT and those in which intubation or mortality were not reported were excluded. Two authors independently screened and selected articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Fixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis were performed according to statistical heterogeneity. Primary outcomes were risk of intubation and mortality across RCTs. Effect estimates were calculated as risk ratios and 95% confidence interval (RR; 95% CI). Observational studies were used for sensitivity analyses.ResultsTwenty studies were analyzed, accounting for 8383 patients, including 6 RCTs (2509 patients) and 14 observational studies (5874 patients). By pooling the 6 RCTs, HFNC compared with COT significantly reduced the risk of intubation (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.98; p = 0.02) and reduced length of stay in hospital. HFNC did not significantly reduce the risk of mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.11; p = 0.40).ConclusionsIn patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, HFNC reduced the need for intubation and shortened length of stay in hospital without significant decreased risk of mortality.Trial registration The study was registered on the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ with the trial registration number CRD42022340035 (06/20/2022).ConclusionsIn patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, HFNC reduced the need for intubation and shortened length of stay in hospital without significant decreased risk of mortality.Trial registration The study was registered on the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ with the trial registration number CRD42022340035 (06/20/2022).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High-flow nasal cannula versus noninvasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Yuewen
    Liu, Na
    Zhuang, Xuhui
    Wang, Xia
    Ma, Wuhua
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2022, 16
  • [32] USE OF HIGH-FLOW NASAL CANNULA FOR IMMUNOCOMPROMISE AND ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Wang, Yiwei
    Ni, Yuenan
    Sun, Jikui
    Liang, Zongan
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 58 (03): : 413 - 423
  • [33] High-flow oxygen nasal cannula for treating acute bronchiolitis in infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tortosa, Fernando
    Izcovich, Ariel
    Carrasco, Gabriela
    Varone, Gabriela
    Haluska, Pedro
    Sanguine, Veronica
    MEDWAVE, 2021, 21 (04):
  • [34] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is superior to conventional oxygen therapy but not to noninvasive mechanical ventilation on intubation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huiying Zhao
    Huixia Wang
    Feng Sun
    Shan Lyu
    Youzhong An
    Critical Care, 21
  • [35] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is superior to conventional oxygen therapy but not to noninvasive mechanical ventilation on intubation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Huiying
    Wang, Huixia
    Sun, Feng
    Lyu, Shan
    An, Youzhong
    CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 21
  • [36] Efficacy of High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Obese Patients during the Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhou, Rong
    Wang, Hao-Tian
    Gu, Wei
    CANADIAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 2022
  • [37] High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Respiratory Failure
    Shein, Steven L.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (14): : 1374 - 1374
  • [38] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy in cardiac surgical patients: A meta-analysis
    Zhu, Youfeng
    Yin, Haiyan
    Zhang, Rui
    Wei, Jianrui
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 38 : 123 - 128
  • [39] High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy or Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately Postextubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Granton, David
    Chaudhuri, Dipayan
    Wang, Dominic
    Einav, Sharon
    Helviz, Yigal
    Mauri, Tommaso
    Mancebo, Jordi
    Frat, Jean-Pierre
    Jog, Sameer
    Hernandez, Gonzalo
    Maggiore, Salvatore M.
    Hodgson, Carol L.
    Jaber, Samir
    Brochard, Laurent
    Trivedi, Vatsal
    Ricard, Jean-Damien
    Goligher, Ewan C.
    Burns, Karen E. A.
    Rochwerg, Bram
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (11) : E1129 - E1136
  • [40] Comparison of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Glenardi
    Chriestya, Febie
    Oetoro, Bambang J.
    Mangkuliguna, Ghea
    Natalia, Natalia
    ACUTE AND CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 37 (01) : 71 - 83