High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Le Pape, Sylvain [1 ,2 ]
Savart, Sigourney [1 ]
Arrive, Francois [1 ]
Frat, Jean-Pierre [1 ,2 ]
Ragot, Stephanie [2 ]
Coudroy, Remi [1 ,2 ]
Thille, Arnaud W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Poitiers, Med Intens Reanimat, 2 Rue Miletrie, F-86021 Poitiers, France
[2] Univ Poitiers, INSERM, CIC 1402, IS ALIVE Res Grp, Poitiers, France
关键词
COVID19; High-flow nasal cannula therapy; Conventional oxygen therapy; Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure; Intubation; Mortality; MORTALITY; VENTILATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13613-023-01208-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 remains uncertain. We aimed at assessing whether HFNC is associated with reduced risk of intubation or mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT).MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing HFNC vs. COT in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, published in English from inception to December 2022. Pediatric studies, studies that compared HFNC with a noninvasive respiratory support other than COT and those in which intubation or mortality were not reported were excluded. Two authors independently screened and selected articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Fixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis were performed according to statistical heterogeneity. Primary outcomes were risk of intubation and mortality across RCTs. Effect estimates were calculated as risk ratios and 95% confidence interval (RR; 95% CI). Observational studies were used for sensitivity analyses.ResultsTwenty studies were analyzed, accounting for 8383 patients, including 6 RCTs (2509 patients) and 14 observational studies (5874 patients). By pooling the 6 RCTs, HFNC compared with COT significantly reduced the risk of intubation (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.98; p = 0.02) and reduced length of stay in hospital. HFNC did not significantly reduce the risk of mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.11; p = 0.40).ConclusionsIn patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, HFNC reduced the need for intubation and shortened length of stay in hospital without significant decreased risk of mortality.Trial registration The study was registered on the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ with the trial registration number CRD42022340035 (06/20/2022).ConclusionsIn patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, HFNC reduced the need for intubation and shortened length of stay in hospital without significant decreased risk of mortality.Trial registration The study was registered on the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ with the trial registration number CRD42022340035 (06/20/2022).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sylvain Le Pape
    Sigourney Savart
    François Arrivé
    Jean-Pierre Frat
    Stéphanie Ragot
    Rémi Coudroy
    Arnaud W. Thille
    Annals of Intensive Care, 13
  • [2] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Youfeng Zhu
    Haiyan Yin
    Rui Zhang
    Jianrui Wei
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 17
  • [3] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhu, Youfeng
    Yin, Haiyan
    Zhang, Rui
    Wei, Jianrui
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2017, 17
  • [4] High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute heart failure: a meta-analysis
    Joana Mesquita Guimaraes, J.
    Gomes, A.
    Saleiro, C.
    Campos, D.
    Teixeira, R.
    Goncalves, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2024, 26 : 416 - 417
  • [5] Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jian-chao
    Peng, Yun
    Dai, Bing
    Hou, Hai-jia
    Zhao, Hong-wen
    Wang, Wei
    Tan, Wei
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2024, 18
  • [6] High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Standard Oxygen in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19
    Gallardo, Adrian
    Devoli, Adrian P.
    Arevalo, German E. M. Bustillo
    Saavedra, Santiago N.
    Moracci, Roque S.
    Pratto, Romina A.
    Plotnikow, Gustavo A.
    Leone, Jose L.
    Travetto, Carolina M.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2022, 67 (12) : 1534 - 1541
  • [7] High-flow nasal oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Pisciotta, Walter
    Passannante, Alberto
    Arina, Pietro
    Alotaibi, Khalid
    Ambler, Gareth
    Arulkumaran, Nishkantha
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (05) : 936 - 944
  • [8] High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rochwerg, B.
    Granton, D.
    Wang, D. X.
    Helviz, Y.
    Einav, S.
    Frat, J. P.
    Mekontso-Dessap, A.
    Schreiber, A.
    Azoulay, E.
    Mercat, A.
    Demoule, A.
    Lemiale, V.
    Pesenti, A.
    Riviello, E. D.
    Mauri, T.
    Mancebo, J.
    Brochard, L.
    Burns, K.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 45 (05) : 563 - 572
  • [9] High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    B. Rochwerg
    D. Granton
    D. X. Wang
    Y. Helviz
    S. Einav
    J. P. Frat
    A. Mekontso-Dessap
    A. Schreiber
    E. Azoulay
    A. Mercat
    A. Demoule
    V. Lemiale
    A. Pesenti
    E. D. Riviello
    T. Mauri
    J. Mancebo
    L. Brochard
    K. Burns
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2019, 45 : 563 - 572
  • [10] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Youfeng
    Yin, Haiyan
    Zhang, Rui
    Ye, Xiaoling
    Wei, Jianrui
    CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 23