The landscape of surgical robotics in orthopedics surgery

被引:8
作者
Yang, Hong Yeol [1 ,2 ]
Seon, Jong Keun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Med Sch, Seoyang Ro 322, Hwasun Gun, Chonnam, South Korea
[2] Hwasun Hosp, Seoyang Ro 322, Hwasun Gun, Chonnam, South Korea
关键词
Robotic surgery; Robotic systems; Total joint arthroplasty; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; UNITED-STATES; OSTEOARTHRITIS; REPLACEMENT; RISK; TECHNOLOGY; PREVALENCE; ARTHRITIS; ALIGNMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s13534-023-00321-8
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Orthopedic surgery is one of the first surgical specialties to apply surgical robotics in clinical practice, which has become an interesting field over the years with promising results. Surgical robotics can facilitate total joint arthroplasty by providing robotic support to accurately prepare the bone, improving the ability to reproduce alignment, and restoring normal kinematics. Various robotic systems are available on the market, each tailored to specific types of surgeries and characterized by a series of features with different requirements and/or modus operandi. Here, a narrative review of the current state of surgical robotic systems for total joint knee arthroplasty is presented, covering the different categories of robots, which are classified based on the operation, requirements, and level of interaction with the surgeon. The different robotic systems include closed/open platform, image-based/imageless, and passive/active/semi-active systems. The main goal of a robotic system is to increase the accuracy and precision of the operation regardless of the type of system. Despite the short history of surgical robots, they have shown clinical effectiveness compared to conventional techniques in orthopedic surgery. When considering which robotic system to use, surgeons should carefully evaluate the different benefits and drawbacks to select the surgical robot that fits their needs the best.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 542
页数:6
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty (RAKA): The Technique, the Technology and the Transition [J].
Bagaria, Vaibhav ;
Sadigale, Omkar S. ;
Pawar, Prashant P. ;
Bashyal, Ravi K. ;
Achalare, Ajinkya ;
Poduval, Murali .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 54 (06) :745-756
[2]   Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty [J].
Banerjee, Samik ;
Cherian, Jeffery J. ;
Elmallah, Randa K. ;
Pierce, Todd P. ;
Jauregui, Julio J. ;
Mont, Michael A. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2016, 13 (01) :47-56
[3]   Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty [J].
Banerjee, Samik ;
Cherian, Jeffrey J. ;
Elmallah, Randa K. ;
Jauregui, Julio J. ;
Pierce, Todd P. ;
Mont, Michael A. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (06) :727-735
[4]  
Barbour KE, 2013, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V62, P869
[5]  
Bargar WL, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P82
[6]   Robotics in Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Bautista, Maria ;
Manrique, Jorge ;
Hozack, William J. .
JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (07) :600-606
[7]  
Buckwalter JA, 2004, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, pS6, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000143938.30681.9d
[8]  
Bukowski Brandon R, 2016, Surg Technol Int, V29, P303
[9]   Survivorship of a Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty A concise Follow-up, at a Minimum of Thirty-five Years, of Previous Reports [J].
Callaghan, John J. ;
Bracha, Peter ;
Liu, Steve S. ;
Piyaworakhun, Somyot ;
Goetz, Devon D. ;
Johnston, Richard C. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (11) :2617-2621
[10]   Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Is robotic technology more accurate than conventional technique? [J].
Citak, Mustafa ;
Suero, Eduardo M. ;
Citak, Musa ;
Dunbar, Nicholas J. ;
Branch, Sharon H. ;
Conditt, Michael A. ;
Banks, Scott A. ;
Pearle, Andrew D. .
KNEE, 2013, 20 (04) :268-271