Does Adoption of Information and Communication Technology Reduce Objective and Subjective Well-Being Inequality? Evidence from China

被引:9
|
作者
Ma, Wanglin [1 ]
Vatsa, Puneet [1 ]
Zheng, Hongyun [2 ]
Donkor, Emmanuel [3 ]
Owusu, Victor [4 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, Fac Agribusiness & Commerce, Dept Global Value Chains & Trade, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Humboldt Univ, Albrecht Daniel Thaer Inst, Agrifood Chain Management Grp, Berlin, Germany
[4] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol KNUST, Dept Agr Econ Agribusiness & Extens, Kumasi, Ghana
关键词
ICT adoption; Objective well-being; Subjective well-being; Inequality; RIF estimation; China; INCOME INEQUALITY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FINANCIAL ACCESS; MOBILE MONEY; ICT; IMPACT; REGRESSION; HAPPINESS; COMMERCE; FARMERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-023-03154-1
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The adoption of information and communication technology (ICT), such as the Internet, smartphones, and tablets, has increased markedly. The present study examines how this adoption affects objective and subjective well-being inequality, using the 2018 China Family Panel Studies data. We employ the Gini coefficient to measure objective well-being inequality indicators (income inequality and consumption inequality) and the variance to measure subjective well-being inequality indicators (happiness inequality and life-satisfaction inequality). The two-stage residual inclusion approach is utilized to address the endogeneity of ICT adoption. The results show that ICT adoption significantly lowers income and consumption inequality. The findings for subjective well-being are mixed: ICT adoption reduces happiness inequality, whereas it does not influence life-satisfaction inequality. Furthermore, income inequality does not influence subjective well-being; however, consumption inequality is positively associated with happiness inequality.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 77
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Political party affiliation and subjective well-being: Evidence from China
    Ma, Xinxin
    ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2024, 38 (04) : 507 - 532
  • [32] Overtime work, job autonomy, and employees' subjective well-being: Evidence from China
    Yang, Shusheng
    Chen, Lijuan
    Bi, Xianjin
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [33] Affluence and Subjective Well-Being: Does Income Inequality Moderate their Associations?
    Weiting Ng
    Ed Diener
    Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2019, 14 : 155 - 170
  • [34] How does Inequality Hamper Subjective Well-being? The Role of Fairness
    Ugur, Zeynep B.
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2021, 158 (02) : 377 - 407
  • [35] Effects of organic farming adoption on farmer's subjective well-being: evidence from Xiangxi Prefecture, China
    Xiang, Pingan
    Wen, Chi
    Lin, Zhifen
    Xia, Maosen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [36] How does Inequality Hamper Subjective Well-being? The Role of Fairness
    Zeynep B. Ugur
    Social Indicators Research, 2021, 158 : 377 - 407
  • [37] How Does Public Health Investment Affect Subjective Well-Being? Empirical Evidence from China
    Yang, Yingzhu
    Zhao, Lexiang
    Cui, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (09)
  • [38] Profitability, income inequality, and subjective well-being of mariculture households in China
    Wu, Jing
    Yang, Hongbo
    Yang, Wu
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (06):
  • [39] Short- and Long-Run Influence of Education on Subjective Well-Being: The Role of Information and Communication Technology in China
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Sohail, Muhammad Tayyab
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [40] Trust in institutions and subjective well-being: Evidence from the Philippines
    Piosang, Tristan
    Grimes, Arthur
    ASIAN POLITICS & POLICY, 2022, 14 (04) : 490 - 517