A systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients

被引:8
|
作者
Philip, Mahima Merin [1 ]
Welch, Andy [2 ]
McKiddie, Fergus [3 ]
Nath, Mintu [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Appl Hlth Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Educ Healthcare & Med Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Natl Hlth Serv Grampian, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Appl Hlth Sci, Med Stat Team, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2023年 / 12卷 / 15期
关键词
head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; positron emission tomography; prognosis; radiomics; systematic review; TUMOR HETEROGENEITY; TEXTURAL FEATURES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; FDG-PET; CANCER; IMAGES; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.6278
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) images of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients can assess the functional and biochemical processes at cellular levels. Therefore, PET radiomics-based prediction and prognostic models have the potentials to understand tumour heterogeneity and assist clinicians with diagnosis, prognosis and management of the disease. We conducted a systematic review of published modelling information to evaluate the usefulness of PET radiomics in the prediction and prognosis of HNSCC patients. MethodsWe searched bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) from 2010 to 2021 and considered 31 studies with pre-defined inclusion criteria. We followed the CHARMS checklist for data extraction and performed quality assessment using the PROBAST tool. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of the prediction and prognostic models using the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and average C-statistic, respectively. ResultsManual segmentation method followed by 40% of the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) thresholding is a commonly used approach. The area under the receiver operating curves of externally validated prediction models ranged between 0.60-0.87, 0.65-0.86 and 0.62-0.75 for overall survival, distant metastasis and recurrence, respectively. Most studies highlighted an overall high risk of bias (outcome definition, statistical methodologies and external validation of models) and high unclear concern in terms of applicability. The meta-analysis showed the estimated pooled DOR of 6.75 (95% CI: 4.45, 10.23) for prediction models and the C-statistic of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.74) for prognostic models. ConclusionsBoth prediction and prognostic models using clinical variables and PET radiomics demonstrated reliable accuracy for detecting adverse outcomes in HNSCC, suggesting the prospect of PET radiomics in clinical settings for diagnosis, prognosis and management of HNSCC patients. Future studies of prediction and prognostic models should emphasise the quality of reporting, external model validation, generalisability to real clinical scenarios and enhanced reproducibility of results.
引用
收藏
页码:16181 / 16194
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of circulating tumor DNA on the prognosis of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Ruoyi
    Li, Teng
    Zhang, Sicheng
    Shui, Chunyan
    Ma, Hong
    Li, Chao
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [32] Positron emission tomography alone, positron emission tomography-computed tomography and computed tomography in diagnosing recurrent cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiao, Yi
    Wei, Jia
    Zhang, Yicheng
    Xiong, Weining
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 10 (02) : 222 - 231
  • [33] Prognostic value of glycolysis markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Yanting
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Jiang, Laibo
    Ren, Xianyue
    Cheng, Bin
    Xia, Juan
    AGING-US, 2021, 13 (05): : 7284 - 7299
  • [34] Prognostic and predictive values of immune infiltrate in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Zhang, Xue-Mei
    Song, Ling-Jun
    Shen, Juan
    Yue, Hao
    Han, Ya-Qin
    Yang, Chen-Ling
    Liu, Shi-Yun
    Deng, Jia-Wen
    Jiang, Yue
    Fu, Guo-Hui
    Shen, Wei-Wei
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 82 : 104 - 112
  • [35] Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radiotherapy-A Systematic Review
    Schanne, Daniel H.
    Koch, Alexander
    Elicin, Olgun
    Giger, Roland
    Medova, Michaela
    Zimmer, Yitzhak
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    BIOMEDICINES, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [36] Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of CTTN/cortactin alterations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ramos-Garcia, Pablo
    Angel Gonzalez-Moles, Miguel
    Ayen, Angela
    Gonzalez-Ruiz, Lucia
    Ruiz-Avila, Isabel
    Antonio Gil-Montoya, Jose
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2019, 41 (06): : 1963 - 1978
  • [37] Predictive value of interim positron emission tomography in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Burggraaff, Coreline N.
    de Jong, Antoinette
    Hoekstra, Otto S.
    Hoetjes, Nikie J.
    Nievelstein, Rutger A. J.
    Jansma, Elise P.
    Heymans, Martijn W.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Zijlstra, Josee M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (01) : 65 - 79
  • [38] Clinical Role of Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography Imaging in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Abdalla, Abdelrahman Sherif
    Sheybani, Natasha D.
    Khan, Saad A.
    PET CLINICS, 2022, 17 (02) : 213 - 222
  • [39] Radiomics in distinguishing between lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Lili
    Zhao, Jinli
    Wei, Zhichao
    Wu, Huiqun
    Sheng, Meihong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [40] Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Evaluation of the Clinically NO Neck in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Ferris, Robert L.
    Cramer, John D.
    Branstetter, Barton F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (20) : 1683 - +