A systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients

被引:12
作者
Philip, Mahima Merin [1 ]
Welch, Andy [2 ]
McKiddie, Fergus [3 ]
Nath, Mintu [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Appl Hlth Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Educ Healthcare & Med Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Natl Hlth Serv Grampian, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Appl Hlth Sci, Med Stat Team, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2023年 / 12卷 / 15期
关键词
head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; positron emission tomography; prognosis; radiomics; systematic review; TUMOR HETEROGENEITY; TEXTURAL FEATURES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; FDG-PET; CANCER; IMAGES; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.6278
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) images of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients can assess the functional and biochemical processes at cellular levels. Therefore, PET radiomics-based prediction and prognostic models have the potentials to understand tumour heterogeneity and assist clinicians with diagnosis, prognosis and management of the disease. We conducted a systematic review of published modelling information to evaluate the usefulness of PET radiomics in the prediction and prognosis of HNSCC patients. MethodsWe searched bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) from 2010 to 2021 and considered 31 studies with pre-defined inclusion criteria. We followed the CHARMS checklist for data extraction and performed quality assessment using the PROBAST tool. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of the prediction and prognostic models using the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and average C-statistic, respectively. ResultsManual segmentation method followed by 40% of the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) thresholding is a commonly used approach. The area under the receiver operating curves of externally validated prediction models ranged between 0.60-0.87, 0.65-0.86 and 0.62-0.75 for overall survival, distant metastasis and recurrence, respectively. Most studies highlighted an overall high risk of bias (outcome definition, statistical methodologies and external validation of models) and high unclear concern in terms of applicability. The meta-analysis showed the estimated pooled DOR of 6.75 (95% CI: 4.45, 10.23) for prediction models and the C-statistic of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.74) for prognostic models. ConclusionsBoth prediction and prognostic models using clinical variables and PET radiomics demonstrated reliable accuracy for detecting adverse outcomes in HNSCC, suggesting the prospect of PET radiomics in clinical settings for diagnosis, prognosis and management of HNSCC patients. Future studies of prediction and prognostic models should emphasise the quality of reporting, external model validation, generalisability to real clinical scenarios and enhanced reproducibility of results.
引用
收藏
页码:16181 / 16194
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Comparison of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of five-year survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Alkhadar, Huda ;
Macluskey, Michaelina ;
White, Sharon ;
Ellis, Ian ;
Gardner, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2021, 50 (04) :378-384
[2]   18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging In Oncology [J].
Almuhaideb, Ahmad ;
Papathanasiou, Nikolaos ;
Bomanji, Jamshed .
ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2011, 31 (01) :3-13
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, DEF REL FREE SURV NC
[4]  
[Anonymous], About Us
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2023, ROBV
[6]   Beyond imaging: The promise of radiomics [J].
Avanzo, Michele ;
Stancanello, Joseph ;
El Naqa, Issam .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 38 :122-139
[7]   FDG PET based prediction of response in head and neck cancer treatment: Assessment of new quantitative imaging features [J].
Beichel, Reinhard R. ;
Ulrich, Ethan J. ;
Smith, Brian J. ;
Bauer, Christian ;
Brown, Bartley ;
Casavant, Thomas ;
Sunderland, John J. ;
Graham, Michael M. ;
Buatti, John M. .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04)
[8]   Head and neck target delineation using a novel PET automatic segmentation algorithm [J].
Berthon, B. ;
Evans, M. ;
Marshall, C. ;
Palaniappan, N. ;
Cole, N. ;
Jayaprakasam, V. ;
Rackley, T. ;
Spezi, E. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 122 (02) :242-247
[9]   Comparison of PET and CT radiomics for prediction of local tumor control in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Bogowicz, Marta ;
Riesterer, Oliver ;
Stark, Luisa Sabrina ;
Studer, Gabriela ;
Unkelbach, Jan ;
Guckenberger, Matthias ;
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2017, 56 (11) :1531-1536
[10]   Overview of the predictive value of quantitative 18 FDG PET in head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy [J].
Castelli, J. ;
De Bari, B. ;
Depeursinge, A. ;
Simon, A. ;
Devillers, A. ;
Jimenez, G. Roman ;
Prior, J. ;
Ozsahin, M. ;
de Crevoisier, R. ;
Bourhis, J. .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2016, 108 :40-51