Patient preferences for epilepsy treatment: a systematic review of discrete choice experimental studies

被引:7
作者
Al-Aqeel, Sinaa [1 ]
Alotaiwi, Reem [1 ]
Albugami, Bushra [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Pharm, Clin Pharm Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Patient preferences; Systematic review; Discrete choice experiments; Epilepsy; ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; SEIZURE CONTROL; HEALTH; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1186/s13561-023-00431-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
BackgroundThis review aimed to 1) identify and assess the quality of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) examining preferences related to epilepsy treatment; 2) summarize the attributes and attribute levels measured in these studies; 3) identify how researchers selected and developed these attributes; and 4) identify which attributes are most important for epilepsy patients.MethodsA systematic literature review using PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases from database inception to February or April 2022. We included primary discrete-choice experiments eliciting preferences for various attributes of pharmacological and surgical interventions in patients diagnosed with epilepsy or the parents/carers of children with epilepsy. We excluded non- primary studies, studies assessing preferences for nonpharmacological treatment and studies that elicit preferences using methods other than discrete choice experiments. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of studies. The quality of the included studies was assessed using two validated checklists. Study characteristics and findings were summarized descriptively.ResultsA total of seven studies were included in the review. The majority of studies explored patients' preferences, and two compared the preferences of patients with physicians. The majority (n = 6) compared two medications, and one compared two surgical options to continuing medication options. The studies examined 44 attributes in total, including side effects (n = 26), efficacy expressed as being seizure free or have fewer seizures (n = 8), costs (n = 3), dosing frequency (n = 3), duration of side effects (n = 2), mortality (n = 1), long-term problems after surgery (n = 1) and surgical options (n = 1). The findings indicate that people with epilepsy have strong preferences for improving seizure control, which was ranked as the top priority in all studies. Patients also have a strong preference for the reduction of adverse effects and may be willing to make trade-offs between improved seizure control and reduction of long-term side effects that may impact their quality of life.ConclusionsThe use of DCEs in measuring patients' preference for epilepsy treatment is accumulating. However, inadequate reporting of methodological details may reduce decision-makers' confidence in the findings. Suggestions for future research are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, NICE GUIDELINE, P1
[2]   Understanding Attributes that Influence Physician and Caregiver Decisions About Neurotechnology for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Formative Qualitative Study to Support the Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment [J].
Apantaku, Glory ;
Aguiar, Magda ;
Kaal, K. Julia ;
McDonald, Patrick J. ;
Connolly, Mary B. ;
Hrincu, Viorica ;
Illes, Judy ;
Harrison, Mark .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (02) :219-232
[3]   A discrete-choice experiment to elicit preferences of patients with epilepsy for self-management programs [J].
Atkinson-Clark, Edward ;
Charokopou, Mata ;
Van Osselaer, Nancy ;
Hiligsmann, Mickael .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 79 :58-67
[4]   Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments [J].
Bien, Daniela R. ;
Danner, Marion ;
Vennedey, Vera ;
Civello, Daniele ;
Evers, Silvia M. ;
Hiligsmann, Mickael .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2017, 10 (05) :553-565
[5]   How do guideline developers identify, incorporate and report patient preferences? An international cross-sectional survey [J].
Blackwood, Jayden ;
Armstrong, Melissa J. ;
Schaefer, Corinna ;
Graham, Ian D. ;
Knaapen, Loes ;
Straus, Sharon E. ;
Urquhart, Robin ;
Gagliardi, Anna R. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
[6]   Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Lloyd, Andrew ;
Prosser, Lisa A. ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Johnson, F. Reed ;
Mauskopf, Josephine .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) :403-413
[7]  
Collacott H, 2022, PATIENT, V15, P55, DOI 10.1007/s40271-021-00536-w
[8]   Patient versus neurologist preferences: A discrete choice experiment for antiepileptic drug therapies [J].
Ettinger, Alan B. ;
Carter, John A. ;
Rajagopalan, Krithika .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 80 :247-253
[9]   Developing attributes for discrete choice experiments in health: a systematic literature review and case study of alcohol misuse interventions [J].
Helter, Timea Mariann ;
Heinrich Boehler, Christian Ernst .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE, 2016, 21 (06) :662-668
[10]   Patient-Focused Drug Development Methods for Benefit-Risk Assessments: A Case Study Using a Discrete Choice Experiment for Antiepileptic Drugs [J].
Holmes, Emily A. F. ;
Plumpton, Catrin ;
Baker, Gus A. ;
Jacoby, Ann ;
Ring, Adele ;
Williamson, Paula ;
Marson, Anthony ;
Hughes, Dyfrig A. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 105 (03) :672-683