Patient preferences, referral process, and access to specialized care. Is patient choice constrained?

被引:0
作者
Huguet, Marius [1 ,6 ]
Joutard, Xavier [2 ,3 ]
Perrier, Lionel [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clermont Auvergne, Mines St Etienne, INP Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, St Etienne, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LEST, Aix En Provence, France
[3] Sci Po, OFCE, Paris, France
[4] Univ Lyon, Leon Berard Canc Ctr, Lyon, France
[5] Ctr Leon Berard, Human & Social Sci Dept, Lyon, France
[6] Mines St Etienne, Ctr Biomed & Healthcare Engn, 158 Cours Fauriel, F-42023 St Etienne, France
关键词
Access to care; patient referrals; consideration set; choice set; patient preferences; I11; C10; QUALITY; INFORMATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2023.2288041
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In most developed countries, patients have been encouraged to elect their preferred choice of health care provider. However, this is different for specialized care, where the patient's referral could be defined as a two-stage decision process and their options are pre-selected by their general practitioner (GP). In this study, we estimate patient preferences while controlling for the pre-selection procedure, and we investigate whether patients are actively choosing their provider for cancer care. The French national hospital discharge database (Programme de Medicalisation des Systemes d'Information, PMSI - MCO 2017) has been used for investigation. We estimated a multinomial choice model when choice sets are in fact unobserved, which is assumed to identify patient preferences, in a revealed preferences framework. Our findings provide evidence that patients consider factors other than distance to select their provider. The patient - hospital distance as well as the specialization profile of providers appears to be internalized in the pre-selection process, while patients rather consider waiting times, hospital quality, and other provider attributes to make their final choice. We also found that patients would be treated in higher-quality hospitals if they had the opportunity to choose among all available providers.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 996
页数:19
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
ARROW KJ, 1963, AM ECON REV, V53, P941
[2]   Subjective and objective quality and choice of hospital: Evidence from, maternal care services in Germany [J].
Avdic, Daniel ;
Moscelli, Giuseppe ;
Pilny, Adam ;
Sriubaite, Leva .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 68
[3]   The effect of hospital/physician integration on hospital choice [J].
Baker, Laurence C. ;
Bundorf, M. Kate ;
Kessler, Daniel P. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 50 :1-8
[4]   Heterogeneous Choice Sets and Preferences [J].
Barseghyan, Levon ;
Coughlin, Maura ;
Molinari, Francesca ;
Teitelbaum, Joshua C. .
ECONOMETRICA, 2021, 89 (05) :2015-2048
[5]   Divided by choice? For-profit providers, patient choice and mechanisms of patient sorting in the English National Health Service [J].
Beckert, Walter ;
Kelly, Elaine .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 30 (04) :820-839
[6]   Choice in the presence of experts: The role of general practitioners in patients' hospital choice [J].
Beckert, Walter .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2018, 60 :98-117
[7]   Evaluation of overall survival and barriers to surgery for patients with breast cancer treated without surgery: a National Cancer Database analysis [J].
Boyce-Fappiano, D. ;
Bedrosian, I ;
Shen, Y. ;
Lin, H. ;
Gjyshi, O. ;
Yoder, A. ;
Shaitelman, S. F. ;
Woodward, W. A. .
NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2021, 7 (01)
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF INTRODUCING MIXED PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR PHYSICIANS: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE [J].
Brosig-Koch, Jeannette ;
Hennig-Schmidt, Heike ;
Kairies-Schwarz, Nadja ;
Wiesen, Daniel .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (02) :243-262
[9]   Utility maximization versus regret minimization in health choice behavior: Evidence from four datasets [J].
Buckell, John ;
Vasavada, Vrinda ;
Wordsworth, Sarah ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Quaife, Matthew .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2022, 31 (02) :363-381
[10]  
Chone P., 2011, Annals of Economics and Statistics, V101/102, P229, DOI [DOI 10.2307/41615481, 10.2307/41615481]