Testing and Refining the Ethical Framework for the Use of Horses in Sport

被引:5
作者
Brown, Bluebell [1 ]
Cardwell, Jacqueline M. [1 ]
Verheyen, Kristien L. P. [1 ]
Campbell, Madeleine L. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathobiol & Populat Sci, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield AL9 7TA, Herts, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Vet Med & Sci, Nottingham LE12 5RD, England
关键词
ethical framework; horse welfare; decision making; equestrian sports; SQUAMOUS GASTRIC DISEASE; PSYCHOLOGICAL REACTANCE; BLOOMS TAXONOMY; ANIMAL-WELFARE; EXERCISE; HEALTH; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE; CONSENSUS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.3390/ani13111821
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In 2021, in response to an acknowledged need for universal, consistent ethics to guide decision making in the horse sport sector, Campbell published a theoretical ethical framework for the use of horses in competitive sport. The research reported here tested the applied usefulness of that theoretical ethical framework through stakeholder engagement in a three-round modified Delphi study and refined it to develop a practical decision-making tool which can be applied consistently across multiple equestrian disciplines. Stakeholders from a broad range of equestrian competitive disciplines participated in the research. Participants were required to apply the ethical framework to a pre-determined ethical dilemma, individually (Rounds 1 and 2) and within a group (Round 3), and at the end of each round to complete a questionnaire designed to gauge opinion and user experience. At the completion of each round of testing, the theoretical framework was refined based on stakeholder feedback. Results showed that participants perceived use ability and application of the framework to generally increase with each round. Qualitative content analysis identified key concepts, including cognition (e.g., broadens/deepens thinking) and application (e.g., considers multiple angles from a variety of information sources, needs to be a short/simple process). Results suggested that the refined framework is beneficial for group decision making across a wide variety of ethical issues and equestrian competitive disciplines. The framework thus has the potential to improve equine welfare through facilitating consistent ethical decision making in which the interests of the horse are prioritized.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   The more the merrier? Increasing group size may be detrimental to decision-making performance in nominal groups [J].
Amir, Ofra ;
Amir, Dor ;
Shahar, Yuval ;
Hart, Yuval ;
Gal, Kobi .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02)
[2]  
[Anonymous], BETA MARK INF
[3]  
[Anonymous], Online Survey
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, INTEL STRATIX 10 GXS, P1, DOI [10.15258/istarules.2022.05, DOI 10.15258/ISTARULES.2022.05]
[5]  
[Anonymous], PETA HORS RAC
[6]  
[Anonymous], DATA PROTECTION ACT
[7]  
[Anonymous], HORS HOUND
[8]  
[Anonymous], Animal Welfare Act
[9]   Team Size and Quality of Group Experience: The More the Merrier? [J].
Aube, Caroline ;
Rousseau, Vincent ;
Tremblay, Sebastien .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2011, 15 (04) :357-375
[10]   Prediction and Control of Broadband Noise Associated with Advanced Air Mobility-A Review [J].
Hua, Jie ;
Mankbadi, Reda R. .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (18)