Investigating the effects of testing protocol factors on chloride binding capacity in cementitious materials

被引:0
作者
Shakouri, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Teymouri, Mohammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Construct Management, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Sch Adv Mat Discovery, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Chloride binding; Degree of saturation; Sample shape; Solution volume; Ionic strength; HYDROXIDE CONCENTRATION; SULFATE; DIFFUSION; CONCRETE; PASTE; HYDRATION; METAKAOLIN; ISOTHERMS; CORROSION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134067
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigates the influence of testing protocol factors, such as the degree of saturation (DoS), exposure solution composition, sample shape, and the solid-to-exposure solution mass ratio (SLR), on the measured chloride binding capacity of cementitious systems. Samples underwent varying degrees of saturation, including vacuum-saturated, partially saturated, and oven-dried conditions. The exposure solution composition included calcium, potassium, and sodium ions, in addition to pure sodium chloride. Different sample forms (powdered, crushed, and disk-shaped) were explored. Three SLRs of 1:3, 1:6, and 1:10 were also examined for their impact on chloride binding. The results indicated that DoS significantly influences chloride binding, with vacuumsaturated samples exhibiting higher binding capacity than partially saturated and oven dried samples. Additionally, the findings showed that samples in solutions containing additional ions had reduced binding capacities compared to pure chloride solutions. Increasing the sample surface area by crushing or powdering it led to an increase in chloride binding capacity compared to solid, disk-shaped specimens. Lastly, the results demonstrated that increasing the SLR can enhance the binding capacity of the system.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Aashto m, 2020, Standard Specification for Portland Cement
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ASTM C1876
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ASTM Standard Guide, DOI [DOI 10.1520/C0305-20, 10.1520/C0305-20]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ASTM C150
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ASTM D3282
[6]   Influence of pH on the chloride binding capacity of Limestone Calcined Clay Cements (LC3) [J].
Avet, Francois ;
Scrivener, Karen .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2020, 131
[7]  
AYRA C, 1990, CEMENT CONCRETE RES, V20, P291
[8]   PhreeqC modeling of Friedel's salt equilibria at 23±1 °C [J].
Bothe, JV ;
Brown, PW .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2004, 34 (06) :1057-1063
[9]   Chloride binding behavior of synthesized reaction products in alkali-activated slag [J].
Cai, Weixi ;
Xu, Zhipeng ;
Zhang, Zhangmin ;
Hu, Jie ;
Huang, Haoliang ;
Ma, Yuwei ;
Zhang, Zuhua ;
Wang, Hao ;
Yin, Suhong ;
Wei, Jiangxiong ;
Shi, Caijun ;
Yu, Qijun .
COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2022, 238
[10]   Influence of sulfate on the chloride diffusion mechanism in mortar [J].
Cao, Yuanzhang ;
Guo, Liping ;
Chen, Bo .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 197 :398-405