Seismic strengthening of deficient ground soft-story RC frames with inadequate lap splice using chevron brace

被引:6
作者
Aljawadi, Ahmed Sabah [1 ]
Vafaei, Mohammadreza [1 ]
Alih, Sophia C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Civil Engn, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Inst Noise & Vibrat, Fac Civil Engn, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia
关键词
Deficient RC frame; Seismic retrofitting; Chevron brace; Cyclic response; Inadequate lap splice length; REINFORCED-CONCRETE FRAMES; BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS; NUMERICAL EVALUATION; NONLINEAR-ANALYSIS; BUILDINGS; HINGE; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; PUSHOVER; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106029
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Deficient RC frames with ground soft-story irregularity have been constructed in many countries. Past earthquakes have shown that such structures are vulnerable and must be retrofitted. This study investigated the cyclic response of two one-bay, two-story, 1/2.5-scaled RC frames with inadequate lap splice length through experimental works and numerical simulations. One of the frames was kept as the reference, and the other was strengthened using a chevron brace system. The frames were subjected to displacement-controlled quasi-static cyclic loading, and their cyclic responses were recorded and compared. Besides, the lumped plasticity model was used to investigate the effect of the strength of infill walls on the force-displacement response of the retrofitted frame. The experimentally obtained results indicated that the employed chevron brace system significantly enhanced the cyclic response of the reference frame. The retrofitted frame exhibited a 171% greater ultimate strength than the reference frame. Besides, the retrofitted frame's initial and post-yield stiffness were 2.2 and 6.9 times greater than that of the reference frame. At a 3.5% drift ratio, the retrofitted frame dissipated 233% more energy than the reference frame. In small drift ratios, the retrofitted frame exhibited a faster decay in the lateral stiffness; however, at large drift ratios, both frames showed a comparable stiffness degradation rate. Numerical simulations showed that the infill wall's lateral strength could alter the retrofitted frame's failure mode and significantly affect its force-displacement response.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Cyclic response and modelling of special moment resisting beams exhibiting fixed-end rotation [J].
Ahmad, Naveed ;
Masoudi, Mostafa ;
Salawdeh, Suhaib .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (01) :203-240
[2]   Eccentric steel brace retrofit for seismic upgrading of deficient reinforced concrete frames [J].
Ahmad, Naveed ;
Masoudi, Mostafa .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (06) :2807-2841
[3]   Performance of reinforced concrete buildings and wooden structures during the 2015 Mw 6.0 Sabah earthquake in Malaysia [J].
Alih, Sophia C. ;
Vafaei, Mohammadreza .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2019, 102 :351-368
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1985, BS 8110-2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Metallic MaterialsTensile TestingPart 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ASTM C109/C109M-02
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, E519E519M10 ASTM
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, FEMA 461
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1997, BS 8110-1
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14). ACI 318-14