A systematic review of general surgery robotic training curriculums

被引：9

作者：

Del Calvo, Haydee

Kim, Min P. ^{[1
,2
]}

Chihara, Ray ^{[1
,2
]}

Chan, Edward Y. ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Houston, TX USA

[2] Houston Methodist Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Surg & Cardiothorac Surg, Houston, TX USA

[3] 6550 Fannin St,Suite 1661, Houston, TX 77030 USA

来源：

HELIYON | 2023年 / 9卷 / 09期

关键词：

Robotic surgery; Resident curriculum; Curriculum assessment; Systematic review;

D O I：

10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19260

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

Background: As of the most recent surveys of resident programs in 2018, only slightly more than half of programs have formal robotic training curriculums implemented. Fewer programs have further assessed their own curriculum and its benefit.Method: We conducted a PubMed/MEDLINE literature search for robotic surgery curriculums and those that had assessment of their programs.Results: A total of 11 studies were reviewed. When reviewed in chronological order, there has been a progression towards more robotic specific objective data analysis as opposed to subjective surveying. There is a wide variation in curriculums, but simulation use is pervasive.Conclusions: Our review makes evident two important concepts-there is great variety in training curriculums and there is great benefit in implementation. The importance is in establishment of what makes resident training effective and supports the adaptable and successful surgeon. This may come from an adaptable curriculum but a structured test-out assessment.

引用

页数：7

共 20 条

[1] Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted cholecystectomy: A retrospective cohort study [J].