Needs-based triggers for timely referral to palliative care for older adults severely affected by noncancer conditions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

被引:12
作者
Kawashima, Arisa [1 ,2 ]
Evans, Catherine J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Nursing Adv Practice, Div Integrated Hlth Sci, Nagoya, Japan
[2] Kings Coll London, Cicely Saunders Inst Palliat Care Policy & Rehabil, Fac Nursing Midwifery & Palliat Care, London, England
[3] Sussex Community NHS Fdn Trust, Brighton, England
关键词
Palliative care; Aged; Systematic review; Referral and consultation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; HEART-FAILURE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; COORDINATED CARE; OUTCOME MEASURES; ADVANCED ILLNESS; CASE-MANAGEMENT; LUNG-DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-023-01131-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundOlder people with noncancer conditions are less likely to be referred to palliative care services due to the inherent uncertain disease trajectory and a lack of standardised referral criteria. For older adults with noncancer conditions where prognostic estimation is unpredictable, needs-based criteria are likely more suitable. Eligibility criteria for participation in clinical trials on palliative care could inform a needs-based criteria. This review aimed to identify and synthesise eligibility criteria for trials in palliative care to construct a needs-based set of triggers for timely referral to palliative care for older adults severely affected by noncancer conditions.MethodsA systematic narrative review of published trials of palliative care service level interventions for older adults with noncancer conditions. Electronic databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. were searched from inception to June 2022. We included all types of randomised controlled trials. We selected trials that reported eligibility criteria for palliative care involvement for older adults with noncancer conditions, where > 50% of the population was aged >= 65 years. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis provided descriptions of the patterns and appraised the applicability of included trial eligibility criteria to identify patients likely to benefit from receiving palliative care.Results27 randomised controlled trials met eligibility out of 9,584 papers. We identified six major domains of trial eligibility criteria in three categories, needs-based, time-based and medical history-based criteria. Needs-based criteria were composed of symptoms, functional status, and quality of life criteria. The major trial eligibility criteria were diagnostic criteria (n = 26, 96%), followed by medical history-based criteria (n = 15, 56%), and physical and psychological symptom criteria (n = 14, 52%).ConclusionFor older adults severely affected by noncancer conditions, decisions about providing palliative care should be based on the present needs related to symptoms, functional status, and quality of life. Further research is needed to examine how the needs-based triggers can be operationalized as referral criteria in clinical settings and develop international consensus on referral criteria for older adults with noncancer conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]  
Abernethy Amy P, 2005, BMC Palliat Care, V4, P7
[2]  
Addington-Hall J., 2001, PALLIATIVE CARE NONC
[3]   Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals [J].
Ahmed, N ;
Bestall, JC ;
Ahmedzai, SH ;
Payne, SA ;
Clark, D ;
Noble, B .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 18 (06) :525-542
[4]  
Ahronheim J C, 2000, J Palliat Med, V3, P265, DOI 10.1089/jpm.2000.3.265
[5]   Outcome evaluation of a randomized trial of the PhoenixCare intervention: Program of case management and coordinated care for the seriously chronically ill [J].
Aiken, Leona S. ;
Butner, Jonathan ;
Lockhart, Carol A. ;
Volk-Craft, Barbara E. ;
Hamilton, Gillian ;
Williams, Frank G. .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 9 (01) :111-126
[6]   Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection [J].
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee ;
Roydhouse, Jessica ;
Rivera, Samantha Cruz ;
Kamudoni, Paul ;
Schache, Peter ;
Wilson, Roger ;
Stephens, Richard ;
Calvert, Melanie .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
[7]   Impact of Applying Palliative Care on Symptoms and Survival of Patients with Advanced Chronic Disease Admitted to the Emergency Department [J].
Amado, Jose P. ;
Vasquez, Rolando ;
Huari, Roberto ;
Rimache, Liliana ;
Lizonde, Rosa .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 26 (03) :332-337
[8]   Dying Alone during a Pandemic [J].
Ann-Yi, Sujin ;
Azhar, Ahsan ;
Bruera, Eduardo .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 24 (12) :1905-1908
[9]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[10]   Use of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire for Monitoring Health Status in Patients With Aortic Stenosis [J].
Arnold, Suzanne V. ;
Spertus, John A. ;
Lei, Yang ;
Allen, Keith B. ;
Chhatriwalla, Adnan K. ;
Leon, Martin B. ;
Smith, Craig R. ;
Reynolds, Matthew R. ;
Webb, John G. ;
Svensson, Lars G. ;
Cohen, David J. .
CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2013, 6 (01) :61-+