Economic Growth and Optimal Tax Burden: A Case of Uzbekistan?s Economy

被引:2
作者
Niyazmetov, Islombek M. [1 ]
Rakhmonov, Azizjon S. [3 ]
Otabekov, Otajon [2 ]
机构
[1] Banking & Finance Acad Republ Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
[2] Westminster Int Univ Tashkent, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
[3] KIMYO Int Univ Tashkent, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
来源
JOURNAL OF TAX REFORM | 2023年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
optimal tax burden; tax effort; economic growth; fiscal policy; taxation; tax system; potential tax revenue; IMPACT;
D O I
10.15826/jtr.2023.9.1.128
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Taxes have always been the largest contributor to the government budget revenue, so it is critical to collect maximum amount of tax revenue to meet policy objectives. The revenue performance of the countries, in turn, depends primarily on optimality of tax burden in an economy and capacity of revenue agencies to levy taxes set by the law. These factors have been major issues for all countries around the world, particularly for transition economies which are on the verge of major economic transformation. Uzbekistan as one of such countries, since 2017 has implemented multiple fiscal reforms to improve the fiscal capacity of the tax system, thereby increasing economic growth. To assess to what extend current tax policies are efficient, we put forward aim of the article as to elaborate the efficiency of Uzbekistan's tax system using tax effort index to measure collection capability of potential tax revenue and optimal tax burden to maximize economic growth. In this study, we first using mathematical model identified tax effort index for Uzbekistan, which appeared to be approximately 45%. This implies that revenue agencies of Uzbekistan failed to collect on average half of the potential tax revenue over the period 2010-2020. Furthermore, we attempted to determine the optimal tax burden using the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method. According to the results of the econometric analysis, the optimal level of tax burden in Uzbekistan for the years 2000-2019 is estimated to be around 19%. Targeting tax burden to this level could reduce GDP gap by 1%.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 63
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Abdullaev B., 2014, APPL ECONOMETRICS IN, V14, P59
[2]  
Abel AB., 2017, MACROECONOMICS
[3]  
Amgain J., 2017, Applied Economics and Finance, V4, P47, DOI DOI 10.11114/AEF.V4I3.2288
[4]  
Armey D., 1995, FREEDOM REV NEW PUBL
[5]   EXISTENCE OF AN EQUILIBRIUM FOR A COMPETITIVE ECONOMY [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. ;
Debreu, Gerard .
ECONOMETRICA, 1954, 22 (03) :265-290
[6]  
Babatunde O A., 2017, Journal of accounting and taxation, V9, P11, DOI DOI 10.5897/JAT2016.0236
[7]   GOVERNMENT SPENDING IN A SIMPLE-MODEL OF ENDOGENOUS GROWTH [J].
BARRO, RJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (05) :S103-S125
[8]   Tax Effort in Developing Countries and High Income Countries: The Impact of Corruption, Voice and Accountability [J].
Bird, Richard M. ;
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge ;
Torgler, Benno .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2008, 38 (01) :55-71
[9]  
Chokri T., 2018, Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, V7, P157
[10]  
Cobb C. W., 1928, The American Economic Review, V18, P139, DOI DOI 10.2307/1811556