Proband-mediated interventions to increase disclosure of genetic risk in families with a BRCA or Lynch syndrome condition: a systematic review

被引:13
作者
Young, Alison Luk [1 ]
Imran, Aalya [2 ]
Spoelma, Michael J. [3 ]
Williams, Rachel [4 ,5 ]
Tucker, Katherine M. [4 ,5 ]
Halliday, Jane [6 ,7 ]
Forrest, Laura E. [8 ,9 ]
Wakefield, Claire E. [10 ,11 ]
Butow, Phyllis N. [12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal North Shore Hosp, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Clin Med, Discipline Psychiat & Mental Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[5] Prince Wales Hosp, Prince Wales Hereditary Canc Ctr, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[6] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[8] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Parkville Familial Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Dept Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] UNSW, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] Sydney Childrens Hosp, Kids Canc Ctr, Behav Sci Unit, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[12] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
COMMUNICATION; CANCER; INFORMATION; RELATIVES; DISSEMINATION; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1038/s41431-022-01200-z
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Interventions to assist family communication about inherited cancer risk have the potential to improve family cancer outcomes. This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of proband-mediated interventions employed within genetics clinics to increase disclosure of genetic risk to at-risk relatives. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed and PsycINFO were searched for publications between 1990-2020. The quality of studies was assessed. From 5605 records reviewed, 9 studies (4 randomised control trials and 5 cohort studies) were included involving families with BRCAI, BRCA2 and Lynch syndrome. Intervention delivery modes included genetic counselling with additional telephone or in-person follow-up, letters, videos, and decision aids. The percentages of at-risk relatives informed by the proband about their risk ranged from 54.0% to 95.5% in the intervention or family-mediated comparison group. Of those who were informed, 24.4-60.0% contacted a genetics clinic and 22.8-76.2% had genetic testing after they were counselled at a genetics clink. Significant differences between intervention and control group were reported on all three outcomes by one study, and with relatives contacting a genetics clinic by another study. The studies suggest but do not conclusively show, that tailored genetic counselling with additional follow-up can increase both the proportion of informed relatives and relatives who contact the genetics clinic. With the increase in germline testing, interventions are required to consider the family communication process and address post-disclosure variables (e.g., relative's perceptions, emotional reactions) through engagement with probands and relatives to maximise the public health benefit of identifying inherited cancer risk in families.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 34
页数:17
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Direct contact in inviting high-risk members of hereditary colon cancer families to genetic counselling and DNA testing [J].
Aktan-Collan, K. ;
Haukkala, A. ;
Pylvanainen, K. ;
Jarvinen, H. J. ;
Aaltonen, L. A. ;
Peltomaki, P. ;
Rantanen, E. ;
Kaariainen, H. ;
Mecklin, J-P .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2007, 44 (11) :732-738
[2]   Sharing genetic risk with next generation: mutation-positive parents' communication with their offspring in Lynch Syndrome [J].
Aktan-Collan, Katja I. ;
Kaariainen, Helena A. ;
Kolttola, Eeva M. ;
Pylvanainen, Kirsi ;
Jarvinen, Heikki J. ;
Haukkala, Ari H. ;
Mecklin, Jukka-Pekka .
FAMILIAL CANCER, 2011, 10 (01) :43-50
[3]  
Buckman, 2017, BREAK BAD NEWS
[4]   Communication of BRCA Results and Family Testing in 1,103 High-Risk Women [J].
Cheung, Eleanor L. ;
Olson, Ashley D. ;
Yu, Tina M. ;
Han, Pamela Z. ;
Beattie, Mary S. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (09) :2211-2219
[5]   Health-care professionals' responsibility to patients' relatives in genetic medicine: a systematic review and synthesis of empirical research [J].
Dheensa, Sandi ;
Fenwick, Angela ;
Shkedi-Rafid, Shiri ;
Crawford, Gillian ;
Lucassen, Anneke .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (04) :290-301
[6]   The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions [J].
Downs, SH ;
Black, N .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) :377-384
[7]   How to support cancer genetics counselees in informing at-risk relatives? Lessons from a randomized controlled trial [J].
Eijzenga, Willem ;
de Geus, Eveline ;
Aalfs, Cora M. ;
Menko, Fred H. ;
Sijmons, Rolf H. ;
de Haes, Hanneke C. J. M. ;
Smets, Ellen M. A. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2018, 101 (09) :1611-1619
[8]   Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations [J].
Finlay, Esme ;
Stopfer, Jill E. ;
Burlingame, Eric ;
Evans, Katherine Goldfeder ;
Nathanson, Katherine L. ;
Weber, Barbara L. ;
Armstrong, Katrina ;
Rebbeck, Timothy R. ;
Domchek, Susan M. .
GENETIC TESTING, 2008, 12 (01) :81-91
[9]   Increased genetic counseling support improves communication of genetic information in families [J].
Forrest, Laura E. ;
Burke, Jo ;
Bacic, Sonya ;
Amor, David J. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 10 (03) :167-172
[10]   Mechanisms to increase cascade testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: Impact of introducing standardized communication aids into genetic counseling [J].
Garcia, Christine ;
Sullivan, Mackenzie W. ;
Lothamer, Heather ;
Harrison, Kara M. ;
Chatfield, Lindsay ;
Thomas, Martha H. ;
Modesitt, Susan C. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (09) :1835-1841