Comparing fluoroscopic versus ultrasound guidance in glenohumeral joint aspiration

被引:2
|
作者
Provo, Justin [1 ]
Teramoto, Masaru [1 ]
Foley, Justin [1 ]
Roesly, Heather [2 ]
Gee, Christopher [3 ]
Cushman, Daniel M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Emergency Med, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
关键词
GUIDED ASPIRATION; ACCURACY; INJECTIONS; SHOULDER; FLUID;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.12873
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background Joint aspiration is a common technique used to aid in the diagnosis of glenohumeral pathology. Fluoroscopy and ultrasound are both used as image-guidance methods to increase the accuracy of the procedure. There are no prior studies comparing the ability of these two methods to obtain joint fluid. Objective To evaluate whether fluoroscopy or ultrasound-image guidance more often obtains fluid from the glenohumeral joint and which technique obtains a greater amount fluid. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Single academic orthopedic clinic. Patients A total of 206 patients undergoing glenohumeral aspiration, generally to rule out infection. Interventions Fluoroscopic- or ultrasound-guided joint aspirations, performed by numerous physicians. Main Outcome Measures Primary was the successful aspiration of at least 0.1 mL of joint fluid; secondary was the total amount of joint fluid obtained. Results There was no significant difference in rate of successful aspirations between ultrasound (69.4% successful; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 54.4%, 84.5%) and fluoroscopy (70.6% successful; 95% CI = 63.7%, 77.4%). The amounts of fluid obtained by fluoroscopy and ultrasound did not differ significantly (p = .349; mean +/- standard deviation [SD] = 7.1 +/- 12.6 vs. 10.0 +/- 16.8 mL; median [interquartile range [IQR] = 3 [7] vs. 5 [8.75] mL). Sub-analysis showed that significantly more fluid was obtained with fluoroscopy in patients with a >35 body mass index (BMI) (adjusted mean = 7.9 mL; 95% CI = 4.3, 11.5) when compared with ultrasound (2.3 mL; 95% CI = 0.6, 4.0). Conclusions Fluoroscopic- and ultrasound-guided aspirations of the glenohumeral joint demonstrate similar success in obtaining fluid. For nonobese patients, ultrasound guidance is typically less expensive, office-based, less uncomfortable, and allows for dynamic visualization. For obese patients, fluoroscopy appears to have an advantage with respect to the amount of fluid obtained. Prospective studies are warranted to make more robust conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 704
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hip aspiration: A comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance
    Roesly, Heather
    Archibeck, Michael
    Henrie, A. Michael
    Provo, Justin
    Foley, Justin
    Boyer, Andrew
    Teramoto, Masaru
    Cushman, Daniel M.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 34 : 266 - 270
  • [2] Comparing the accuracy and efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus blind injections of steroid in the glenohumeral joint in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis
    Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
    Rayegani, Seyed Mansoor
    Langroudi, Taraneh Faghihi
    Khoiniha, Maryam
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 36 (04) : 933 - 940
  • [3] Comparing the accuracy and efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus blind injections of steroid in the glenohumeral joint in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis
    Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat
    Seyed Mansoor Rayegani
    Taraneh Faghihi Langroudi
    Maryam Khoiniha
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2017, 36 : 933 - 940
  • [4] Importance of Image Guidance in Glenohumeral Joint Injections Comparing Rates of Needle Accuracy Based on Approach and Physician Level of Training
    Mattie, Ryan
    Kennedy, David J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2016, 95 (01) : 57 - 61
  • [5] The Routine Versus Selective Use of Ultrasound to Guide Joint Aspiration
    Gottlieb, Michael
    Alerhand, Stephen
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 75 (02) : 261 - 262
  • [6] Is ultrasound-guided hip aspiration more successful than fluoroscopic-guided aspiration in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection?
    Treu, Emily A.
    Cushman, Daniel M.
    Wheelwright, John C.
    Blackburn, Brenna E.
    Teramoto, Masaru
    Archibeck, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT INFECTION, 2023, 8 (03) : 151 - 163
  • [7] Comparing the Accuracy of Ultrasound versus Fluoroscopy in Glenohumeral Injections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Amber, Kyle T.
    Landy, David C.
    Amber, Ian
    Knopf, David
    Guerra, Jorge
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2014, 42 (07) : 411 - 416
  • [8] Ultrasound Guided Spine Injections: Advancement Over Fluoroscopic Guidance?
    Yoon S.H.
    O’Brien S.L.
    Tran M.
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 2013, 1 (2) : 104 - 113
  • [9] Detection and quantification of glenohumeral joint effusion: reliability of ultrasound
    Zubler, Veronika
    Mamisch-Saupe, Nadja
    Pfirrmann, Christian W. A.
    Jost, Bernhard
    Zanetti, Marco
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (09) : 1858 - 1864
  • [10] Value of Ultrasound Before Joint Aspiration
    Hadduck, Tyson A.
    van Holsbeeck, Marnix T.
    Girish, Gandikota
    Dong, Qian
    Morag, Yoav
    Jacobson, Jon A.
    Fessell, David P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (03) : W453 - W459