Farmers' technology preference and influencing factors for pesticide reduction: evidence from Hubei Province, China

被引:20
作者
Liu, Di [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Yanzhong [1 ]
Luo, Xiaofeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Inst Technol, Sch Law & Business, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pesticide reduction; Technology preference; Influencing factors; Rice farmers; Hubei Province; KNOWLEDGE; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-22654-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Based on the successful experience of pesticide reduction in China, this study uses survey data from Hubei Province to measure rice farmers' technology preferences for pesticide reduction considering their needs, and compare the heterogeneous factors influencing farmers' adoption behavior. The results show that large-scale farmers prefer drone services and efficient machinery, while small-scale farmers prefer scientific standards and biopesticides for pesticide reduction. Second, farmers' adoption behavior of pesticide reduction technologies is mostly influenced by education, risk attitude, income, agricultural labor, scale, rice price, residue testing, brand, training, subsidy, and demonstration. Among them, education, risk attitude, scale, rice price, cost, and training, significantly affect farmers' adoption level of multiple pesticide reduction technologies. Further, higher rice prices and participation in training could promote the use of pesticide reduction technologies in a larger area by farmers. Therefore, the real needs of farmers should be focused on the promotion of pesticide reduction technologies, and pesticide reduction programs in different regions should carry out precise intervention policies. These findings can provide practical policy guidance for effective pesticide reduction in the central region of China.
引用
收藏
页码:6424 / 6434
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Farmers' behavior in reading and using risk information displayed on pesticide labels: a test with the theory of planned behavior [J].
Bagheri, Asghar ;
Emami, Naier ;
Damalas, Christos A. .
PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 77 (06) :2903-2913
[2]   Willingness to pay for pesticide reduction in the EU: nothing but organic? [J].
Bazoche, Pascale ;
Combris, Pierre ;
Giraud-Heraud, Eric ;
Seabra Pinto, Alexandra ;
Bunte, Frank ;
Tsakiridou, Efthimia .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 41 (01) :87-109
[3]   Understanding farmers' reluctance to reduce pesticide use: A choice experiment [J].
Cheze, Benoit ;
David, Maia ;
Martinet, Vincent .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 167
[4]   Does crop insurance reduce pesticide usage? Evidence from China [J].
Feng, Shuaizhang ;
Han, Yujie ;
Qiu, Huanguang .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 69
[5]   Farm size and pesticide use: evidence from agricultural production in China [J].
Gao, Jingjing ;
Gai, Qingen ;
Liu, Binbin ;
Shi, Qinghua .
CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 13 (04) :912-929
[6]   Adoption behavior of green control techniques by family farms in China: Evidence from 676 family farms in Huang-huai-hai Plain [J].
Gao, Yang ;
Zhang, Xiao ;
Lu, Jiao ;
Wu, Lei ;
Yin, Shijiu .
CROP PROTECTION, 2017, 99 :76-84
[7]   Wicked evolution: Can we address the sociobiological dilemma of pesticide resistance? [J].
Gould, Fred ;
Brown, Zachary S. ;
Kuzma, Jennifer .
SCIENCE, 2018, 360 (6390) :728-732
[8]   'Smart' policies to reduce pesticide use and avoid income trade-offs: An agent-based model applied to Thai agriculture [J].
Grovermann, Christian ;
Schreinemachers, Pepijn ;
Riwthong, Suthathip ;
Berger, Thomas .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 132 :91-103
[9]  
[郭清卉 Guo Qinghui], 2020, [干旱区资源与环境, Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment], V34, P39
[10]   ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF INTERVENTIONS - AN OVERVIEW [J].
HECKMAN, JJ ;
ROBB, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1985, 30 (1-2) :239-267