Inclusion of person-centred care in UK postgraduate medical education curricula: Interviews and documentary analysis

被引:1
作者
Moore, Heather L. [1 ]
Watson, Rose [2 ]
Farnworth, Allison [3 ]
Giles, Karen [4 ]
Tomson, David [5 ]
Thomson, Richard G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Psychol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4DR, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Educ Commun & Language Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Univ Sunderland, Fac Hlth Sci & Wellbeing, Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, England
[5] Collingwood Hlth Grp, Collingwood Surg, North Shields, England
关键词
Person-centred care; Postgraduate education; Curriculum; Medical; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; PATIENT; INTERVENTION; EFFICACY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-023-04730-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Person-centred care (PCC) involves placing people at the centre of their healthcare decision making to ensure it meets their needs, values, and personal circumstances. Increasingly, PCC is promoted in healthcare policy and guidance, but little is known about how this is embedded in postgraduate medical training. The aim of this research was to understand how PCC is embedded in UK postgraduate medical training and explore factors influencing inclusion of PCC in curricula content. Methods To explore this, we interviewed senior professionals with key roles in the curricula from four UK Royal Colleges (Psychiatrists; Physicians; Surgeons; and GPs) and used framework analysis on interviews and relevant curricula documents to identify themes. Results Legislation and professional/educational guidance influenced inclusion. PCC definitions and terminology differed and placement within curricula was variable. Royal Colleges defined the curriculum and provided training to ensure competence, but local deaneries independently implemented the curriculum. Trainer engagement was greater than trainee buy in. Quality assurance focused on feedback from trainers and trainees rather than patients, and patient and public involvement in curriculum development, teaching, and assessment was limited. Conclusions There is a need for cross-organisation collaboration to develop a PCC competence framework that defines the skills and level of competence required at different points in training, with clarity around the differences between undergraduate and postgraduate requirements. Greater auditing and quality assurance of programme delivery would help identify successful practices to share within and across Royal Colleges, while still maintaining the flexibility of local provision. Engagement with patients and the public in this work can only strengthen provision.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, NVivo qualitative data analysis software
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Person centred care made simple: What everyone should know about person centred care
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Is the NHS becoming more person-centered? Topic overview
[4]  
[Anonymous], The NHS constitution for England: The NHS belongs to us all
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Transforming participation in health and care: The NHS belongs to us all
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GOOD MED PRACTICE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Generic professional capabilities framework
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSSING QUALITY CHA, DOI [10.17226/10027, DOI 10.17226/10027]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Service user experience in adult mental health: Improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS mental health services
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2019, UN PERS CAR IMPL COM