Protecting Built Heritage against Flood: Mapping Value Density on Flood Hazard Maps

被引:3
作者
Brokerhof, Agnes W. [1 ]
van Leijen, Renate [2 ]
Gersonius, Berry [3 ]
机构
[1] Cultural Heritage Agcy Netherlands, Cultural Heritage Lab, Hobbemastr 22, NL-1071 ZC Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Cultural Heritage Agcy Netherlands, Safe Heritage Programme, Smallepad 5, NL-3811 MG Amersfoort, Netherlands
[3] Municipal Dordrecht, Spuiboulevard 300, NL-3311 GR Dordrecht, Netherlands
关键词
cultural heritage; cultural value; flood; risk map; vulnerability; VULNERABILITY; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.3390/w15162950
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper describes the development and trial of a method (Quick Flood Risk Scan method) to determine the vulnerable value of monuments for flood risk assessment. It was developed in the context of the European Flood Directive for the Dutch Flood Risk Management Plan. The assessment method enables differentiation of cultural heritage by cultural value and vulnerability to water from rainfall or flooding. With this method, hazard or exposure maps can be turned into risk maps showing the potential loss of cultural value in case of flooding with a particular probability. The Quick Flood Risk Scan method has been tested and validated in the City of Dordrecht, the Netherlands. This application was facilitated by an Open Lab of the SHELTER project. The trial in Dordrecht showed the potential of a simple method to prioritize monuments without calculations. The Quick Flood Risk Scan method enables even the non-expert assessor to make a preliminary qualitative assessment that can be followed by further analysis of a relevant selection of assets. It is useful as a low tier that feeds into higher tiers of a multi-level framework. The non-expert assessor may be a policy maker, an owner of a heritage asset, or an inhabitant. Nonetheless, the trial also raised several questions, ranging from where in a building valuable heritage is located and what the role of the building owner is to how policy makers implement the method and its outcomes. These questions provide relevant input for fine-tuning the method.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks
[2]   Definition of a Risk Assessment Model within a European Interoperable Database Platform (EID) for Cultural Heritage [J].
Appiotti, Federica ;
Assumma, Vanessa ;
Bottero, Marta ;
Campostrini, Pierpaolo ;
Datola, Giulia ;
Lombardi, Patrizia ;
Rinaldi, Enrico .
JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE, 2020, 46 :268-277
[3]   Flood risk assessment in art cities: the exemplary case of Florence (Italy) [J].
Arrighi, C. ;
Brugioni, M. ;
Castelli, F. ;
Franceschini, S. ;
Mazzanti, B. .
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 11 :S616-S631
[4]   A Global Scale Analysis of River Flood Risk of UNESCO World Heritage Sites [J].
Arrighi, Chiara .
FRONTIERS IN WATER, 2021, 3
[5]  
Bloemen P. J. T. M., 2019, DECISION MAKING DEEP, P321, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-05252-214, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05252-2]
[6]  
Bonazza Alessandra, 2018, Safeguarding Cultural Heritage from Natural and man-made Disasters
[7]  
Brokerhof A.W., 2017, Risk management for collections
[8]   The QuiskScan-a quick risk scan to identify value and hazards in a collection [J].
Brokerhof, Agnes W. ;
Bulow, Anna E. .
JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF CONSERVATION, 2016, 39 (01) :18-28
[9]  
Center A.D.R., 2015, Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030
[10]  
Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology (CEDIM), RISK MAP GERM EARTHQ