Identifying Critical Indicators in Performance Evaluation of Green Supply Chains Using Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Changlu [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Liqian [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Beijing Key Lab Big Data Decis Making Green Dev, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
关键词
green supply chain; performance evaluation; critical indicators; fuzzy DEMATEL-based ANP; MCDM;
D O I
10.3390/su15076095
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Performance evaluation of green supply chains (GSC) is an important tool to improve their comprehensive management. Identifying critical indicators is crucial to evaluation. This study examines the critical indicators in performance evaluations of GPC and provides relevant suggestions for managers to improve GSCs' performances. Firstly, we summarized 24 evaluation indicators from five dimensions-financial value, customer service-level, business processes, innovation and development, and the so-called green level. Secondly, the Delphi method was used to determine the formal research framework. The fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory based analytic network process (fuzzy DEMATEL-based ANP) model was applied. The weighted prominence of each indicator was calculated to identify those that were critical, and a causality diagram was constructed for them. Finally, corresponding countermeasures and implications regarding those were put forward. The research results show that the critical indicators include the return rate of net assets, the growth rate of profit, the rate of service satisfaction, market share, production flexibility, and the green consensus. Among them, the green consensus, the growth rate of profit and the rate of service satisfaction form a virtuous circle, leading to the improvement of the overall performance of GSC.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying Critical Risk Factors in Green Product Certification Using Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making
    Zhang, Changlu
    Zhang, Jian
    Yang, Qiong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [2] Hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications in engineering
    Zavadskas, E. K.
    Antucheviciene, J.
    Turskis, Z.
    Adeli, H.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2016, 23 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [3] Commercial diver selection using multiple-criteria decision-making methods
    Ozyigit, Tamer
    Egi, S. Murat
    UNDERSEA AND HYPERBARIC MEDICINE, 2014, 41 (06) : 565 - 572
  • [4] Evaluation of nanostructured electrode materials for high-performance supercapacitors using multiple-criteria decision-making approach
    Hezam, Ibrahim M.
    Syadi, Aref M. Al-
    Foul, Abdelaziz
    Alshamrani, Ahmad
    Gwak, Jeonghwan
    ELECTRONIC RESEARCH ARCHIVE, 2023, 31 (04): : 2286 - 2314
  • [5] A Hybrid Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision Making
    Zeng, Shouzhen
    Chen, Jianping
    Li, Xingsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2016, 15 (02) : 403 - 422
  • [6] Assessing the Circular Economy in Regions of Chile by Using Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)
    Komasi, Hossein
    Yazdi, Amir Karbassi
    Sani, Mohammad Eskandari
    Tan, Yong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [7] Navigating the Complexity of HRM Practice: A Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Framework
    Mircetic, Vuk
    Popovic, Gabrijela
    Vukotic, Svetlana
    Mihic, Marko
    Kovacevic, Ivana
    Dokovic, Aleksandar
    Slavkovic, Marko
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (23)
  • [8] A multiple-criteria decision-making model for evaluating sustainability of business enterprises
    Rathviboon, S. (san.rathviboon@ait.ac.th), 1600, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland (14): : 315 - 332
  • [9] A HYBRID MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR INVESTMENT DECISION MAKING
    Hsu, Li-Chang
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 15 (03) : 509 - 529
  • [10] Selection of the Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Development: A Case Study of Poland
    Trojanowska, Malgorzata
    Necka, Krzysztof
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)