Prediction of Springback using the Machine Learning Technique in high-tensile strength sheet metal during the V-Bending Process

被引:3
作者
Wasif, Muhammad [1 ]
Rababah, Mahmoud [2 ]
Fatima, Anis [1 ]
Baig, Saad Ur Rehman [1 ]
机构
[1] NED Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn IMD, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] Hashemite Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, POB 150459, Zarqa 13115, Jordan
关键词
Sheet metal bending; springback; high strength steel; machine learning algorithms; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; STEEL; BEHAVIOR; DEFLECTION;
D O I
10.59038/jjmie/170403
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Bending is one of the widely used forming processes for sheet metals. However, due to the metal elasticity, the springback characteristic is unavoidable, leading to deviations from the desired final shapes and causing cumulative fitting problems in the assembly stages. Thus, precise predictions of the springback responses will enhance the sheet metal forming and the overall manufacturing processes. This is achieved by employing tree-based machine learning algorithms. These algorithms are used for their simplicity, preciseness, and consistency. Based on the tree-based algorithms, many prediction models are constructed and evaluated. First, experimental setup is established to measure the springback angles for different manufacturing conditions such as: the bending angle, the sheet metal's width and thickness, the machine settings, etc. Then, these data sets are divided into training and testing groups for the prediction models. This division is carried randomly, where 90 % of the data sets are used for training, and 10 % are left for testing the models' accuracy. The models are evaluated by comparing their predicted springback angles with the experimental values. The deviation errors are measured using the Mean Square Error (MSE), the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE).It isrevealed that the LightGBM prediction model is the most accurate model with 0.42 deg., 0.26 deg., and 0.52 deg. for MAE, MSE, and RMSE, respectively. The Gradient boosting comes in the second place with 0.66 deg., 0.760 deg., and 0.80 deg. for MAE, MSE, and RMSE, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 488
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Asmael M, 2023, JORDAN J MECH IND EN, V17, P1
[2]  
Bozdemir M., 2008, Journal of Applied Sciences, V8, P3038, DOI 10.3923/jas.2008.3038.3043
[3]  
Cai Z.H., 2019, ADV HIGH STRENGTH ST, V1, P117, DOI [10.1142/9789813277984_0019, DOI 10.1142/9789813277984_0019]
[4]   Advanced constitutive modeling of advanced high strength steel sheets for springback prediction after double stage U-draw bending [J].
Choi, Jisik ;
Lee, Jinwoo ;
Bong, Hyuk Jong ;
Lee, Myoung-Gyu ;
Barlat, Frederic .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 151 :152-164
[5]  
Cong Liu, 2019, Materials Science Forum, V944, P753, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.944.753
[6]  
Da Silva E.A., 2016, IOSR J MECH CIVIL EN, V13, P21, DOI [10.9790/1684-1305012127, DOI 10.9790/1684-1305012127]
[7]  
Dezelak M., 2012, Advances in Production Engineering & Management, V7, P17
[8]  
Gharaibeh MA, 2019, JORDAN J MECH IND EN, V13, P253
[9]   Development of an artificial neural network to predict springback in air vee bending [J].
Inamdar, M ;
Date, PP ;
Narasimhan, K ;
Maiti, SK ;
Singh, UP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 16 (05) :376-381
[10]   On the effects of geometric parameters on springback in sheets of five materials subjected to air vee bending [J].
Inamdar, MV ;
Date, PP ;
Sabnis, SV .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 123 (03) :459-463