Seismic response analysis of pile-supported wharf under three types of near-fault ground motion

被引:2
作者
Wang, Jianfeng [1 ]
Su, Lei [1 ]
Xie, Libo [1 ]
Ling, Xianzhang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Seismic response; Pile-supported wharf; Near-fault ground motions; Forward-directivity effect; Fling-step effect; STOCHASTIC-MODEL; FLING STEP; DIRECTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; EARTHQUAKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105144
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Near-fault pulse-like ground motions exhibit distinct properties, such as forward-directivity and fling-step effects. It is necessary to study the seismic response characteristics of the pile-supported wharf (PSW) under different near-fault ground motions. In this study, thirty near-fault ground motions were utilized as input motions, including forward-directivity, fling-step and non-pulse ground motions. A three-dimensional (3D) nonlinear finite element (FE) model was created to simulate the PSW structure. The seismic response (displacement, bending moment, and acceleration) of the PSW structure under 30 ground motions with peak ground acceleration (PGA), effective peak acceleration (EPA), improved effective peak acceleration (IEPA), peak ground velocity (PGV) and effective peak velocity (EPV) scaling were calculated and compared. The simulation results demonstrate that the PSW structure responds more significantly under two types of near-fault pulse-like ground motion. For near-fault pulse-like ground motions, PGV scaling is better for studying displacement/bending moment response of PSW structure than others. EPA scaling is suitable for studying the acceleration response of PSW structure.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Akai K., 1997, Geotechnical reconnaissance of the effects of the January 17, 1995, Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake, Japan
[2]   ASPERITIES, BARRIERS, CHARACTERISTIC EARTHQUAKES AND STRONG MOTION PREDICTION [J].
AKI, K .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 89 (NB7) :5867-5872
[3]   Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region [J].
Bray, JD ;
Rodriguez-Marek, A .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2004, 24 (11) :815-828
[4]  
Chalmers Gary, 2013, Ports 2013, P1405
[5]  
Chang S.E., 2000, J TRANSP GEOGR, V8, P53, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923(99)00023-X
[6]   Seismic response analysis of intake tower structure under near-fault ground motions with forward-directivity and fling-step effects [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Liu, Yunhe ;
Zhou, Binpeng ;
Yang, Dixiong .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 132
[7]   Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions [J].
Chopra, AK ;
Chintanapakdee, C .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2001, 30 (12) :1769-1789
[8]  
Council AT Association SE of California., 1978, Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings: A cooperative effort with the design professions, building code interests, and the research community, No. 6
[9]   Stochastic model for simulation of near-fault ground motions [J].
Dabaghi, Mayssa ;
Der Kiureghian, Armen .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2017, 46 (06) :963-984
[10]   Sensitivity of structural responses to the processing of near-fault ground motion records containing fling-step [J].
Daei, Aydin ;
Poursha, Mehdi ;
Zarrin, Mohamad .
ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 26 (06) :1114-1129