Benchmarking Sustainable Mobility in Higher Education

被引:5
作者
Cappelletti, Giulio Mario [1 ]
Grilli, Luca [1 ]
Russo, Carlo [1 ]
Santoro, Domenico [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Econ Management & Terr, I-71121 Foggia, Italy
[2] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Econ & Finance, I-70124 Bari, Italy
关键词
Sustainable Mobility; SDG; 11; Life Cycle Assessment; Sustainable Eco-Indicator University; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORT SUSTAINABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; URBAN MOBILITY; VEHICLES; HYBRID; PERFORMANCE; METHODOLOGY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3390/su15065190
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable mobility is an increasingly significant issue that both public and private organizations consider in order to reduce emissions by their members. In this paper, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach was used to evaluate sustainable mobility. Data coming from a study carried out at the University of Foggia were processed by Gabi LCA software to estimate the environmental performance of the community members according to the methodology of the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) guidelines 3.0. Results of the LCA were organized in different classes, creating an eco-indicator of sustainable mobility that can be applied to both the institution and individual members (called the Sustainable Mobility Indicator, SMI). The SMI, computed to assess the environmental impact of the University of Foggia, was also used to evaluate the best mobility scenario, which can be considered a benchmark. The creation of the performance classes and benchmark analysis represents an easier way to communicate sustainability based on the recommendations for achieving the sustainable development goals from the 2030 Agenda adopted by all United Nations Member States. Indeed, any organization can carry out this approach to assess its environmental impact (in terms of mobility) and shape transport policies accordingly, leading to the adoption of sustainable solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   Life Cycle Air Emissions External Costs Assessment for Comparing Electric and Traditional Passenger Cars [J].
Girardi, Pierpaolo ;
Brambilla, Cristina ;
Mela, Giulio .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 16 (01) :140-150
[22]   Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services [J].
Gompf, Katharina ;
Traverso, Marzia ;
Hetterich, Joerg .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) :1-10
[23]   Multi-Criteria Analysis Procedure for Sustainable Mobility Evaluation in Urban Areas [J].
Gouvea Campos, Vania Barcellos ;
Rodrigues Ramos, Rui Antonio ;
Correia, Denise de Miranda e Silva .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2009, 43 (04) :371-390
[24]   Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison [J].
Haghshenas, Hossein ;
Vaziri, Manouchehr .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 15 (01) :115-121
[25]   Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles-a review [J].
Hawkins, Troy R. ;
Gausen, Ola Moa ;
Stromman, Anders Hammer .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (08) :997-1014
[26]   Planning more for sustainable mobility [J].
Hickman, Robin ;
Hall, Peter ;
Banister, David .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 33 :210-219
[27]   Sustainable Mobility at Thirty [J].
Holden, Erling ;
Gilpin, Geoffrey ;
Banister, David .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (07)
[28]   Sustainable mobility indicators for Indian cities: Selection methodology and application [J].
Jain, Deepty ;
Tiwari, Geetam .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 79 :310-322
[29]  
JRC, 2010, International Reference Life Cycle Data (ILCD) System Handbook
[30]   Carbon Footprint and Water Footprint of Electric Vehicles and Batteries Charging in View of Various Sources of Power Supply in the Czech Republic [J].
Jursova, Simona ;
Burchart-Korol, Dorota ;
Pustejovska, Pavlina .
ENVIRONMENTS, 2019, 6 (03)