Benchmarking Sustainable Mobility in Higher Education

被引:5
作者
Cappelletti, Giulio Mario [1 ]
Grilli, Luca [1 ]
Russo, Carlo [1 ]
Santoro, Domenico [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Econ Management & Terr, I-71121 Foggia, Italy
[2] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Econ & Finance, I-70124 Bari, Italy
关键词
Sustainable Mobility; SDG; 11; Life Cycle Assessment; Sustainable Eco-Indicator University; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORT SUSTAINABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; URBAN MOBILITY; VEHICLES; HYBRID; PERFORMANCE; METHODOLOGY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3390/su15065190
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable mobility is an increasingly significant issue that both public and private organizations consider in order to reduce emissions by their members. In this paper, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach was used to evaluate sustainable mobility. Data coming from a study carried out at the University of Foggia were processed by Gabi LCA software to estimate the environmental performance of the community members according to the methodology of the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) guidelines 3.0. Results of the LCA were organized in different classes, creating an eco-indicator of sustainable mobility that can be applied to both the institution and individual members (called the Sustainable Mobility Indicator, SMI). The SMI, computed to assess the environmental impact of the University of Foggia, was also used to evaluate the best mobility scenario, which can be considered a benchmark. The creation of the performance classes and benchmark analysis represents an easier way to communicate sustainability based on the recommendations for achieving the sustainable development goals from the 2030 Agenda adopted by all United Nations Member States. Indeed, any organization can carry out this approach to assess its environmental impact (in terms of mobility) and shape transport policies accordingly, leading to the adoption of sustainable solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Evaluation of sustainable urban mobility using comparative environmental life cycle assessment: A case study of Qatar [J].
Al-Thawadi, Fatima E. ;
Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 1
[2]   Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities [J].
Alonso, Andrea ;
Monzon, Andres ;
Cascajo, Rocio .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 48 :578-592
[3]   The way to sustainable mobility. A comparative analysis of sustainable mobility plans in Spain [J].
Angel Mozos-Blanco, Miguel ;
Pozo-Menendez, Elisa ;
Arce-Ruiz, Rosa ;
Baucells-Aleta, Neus .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2018, 72 :45-54
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ISO Standard No. 9000:2015)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, IEA TASK 31 FUELS EN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Data Quality Guideline for the Ecoinvent Database Version 3
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2021, International Organization for Standardization Environmental ManagementLife Cycle AssessmentPrinciples and Framework
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ISO 14044
[9]   The sustainable mobility paradigm [J].
Banister, David .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2008, 15 (02) :73-80
[10]  
Bauman H TA:., 2004, Te Hitchhiker's Guide to LCA (Studentlitteratur AB)