A Matter of Trust: How Political and Social Trust Relate to the Acceptance of Covid-19 Policies in Germany

被引:17
作者
Jaeckle, Sebastian [1 ]
Truedinger, Eva-Maria [2 ]
Hildebrandt, Achim [2 ]
Wagschal, Uwe [1 ]
机构
[1] Albert Ludwigs Univ Freiburg, Seminar Wiss Polit, D-79098 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Sozialwissensch, Berlin, Germany
关键词
PUBLIC TRUST; SUPPORT; GOVERNMENT; ATTITUDES; IDEOLOGY; BEHAVIOR; SECURITY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1080/09644008.2021.2021510
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In Germany, the federal and Länder governments have been implementing policies in order to contain the spread of Covid-19 since March 2020. This article examines the effects of political and social trust on the acceptance of these policies. The latter is, in turn, a prerequisite for compliance with public policy. In a multi-level regression analysis based on two waves of survey data collected in May and November 2020, we find that trust relates to the acceptance of anti-pandemic measures. Political trust, i.e. trust in political actors and institutions has a positive effect on acceptance. Social trust, meaning the trust in other citizens is found to reduce acceptance of measures like contact restrictions. In addition, ideological positions influence the effects of both trust variables. The impact of political trust on acceptance increases with increasingly liberal positions in both survey waves, since individuals with these positions might generally be more wary of state interference. We also found an interaction between social trust and ideology during the second wave: the further respondents are on the political right, the more the negative effect of social trust on acceptance is enhanced, as these individuals might favour individualism and self-reliance in general. © 2022 Association for the Study of German Politics.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 642
页数:25
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Altemeyer B., 1996, The authoritarian specter
[2]  
Bauer, 2018, Oxford Handbook of Political and Social Trust, P15
[3]   Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia [J].
Blair, Robert A. ;
Morse, Benjamin S. ;
Tsai, Lily L. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 172 :89-97
[4]   COVID-19: effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public [J].
Cairney, Paul ;
Wellstead, Adam .
POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE, 2021, 4 (01) :1-14
[5]   Determinants of human rights attitudes and behavior: A comparison and integration of psychological perspectives [J].
Cohrs, J. Christopher ;
Maes, Juergen ;
Moschner, Barbara ;
Kielmann, Sven .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 28 (04) :441-469
[6]   Interpersonal trust and welfare state support [J].
Daniele, Gianmarco ;
Geys, Benny .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2015, 39 :1-12
[7]   Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America [J].
Davis, DW ;
Silver, BD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 48 (01) :28-46
[8]   Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature [J].
Devine, Daniel ;
Gaskell, Jennifer ;
Jennings, Will ;
Stoker, Gerry .
POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2021, 19 (02) :274-285
[9]  
Dohle S., 2020, Social Psychological Bulletin, V15, DOI DOI 10.32872/SPB.4315
[10]   The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes [J].
Duckitt, J ;
Fisher, K .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 24 (01) :199-222