Contraceptive care in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: A social media survey of contraceptive access, telehealth use and telehealth quality

被引:4
作者
Merz-Herrala, Allison A. [1 ]
Kerns, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Logan, Rachel [2 ]
Gutierrez, Sirena [3 ]
Marshall, Cassondra [4 ]
Diamond-Smith, Nadia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Family & Community Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA USA
关键词
Contraception; COVID-19; Region; Telehealth; TELEMEDICINE; ABORTION; EXPERIENCES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110000
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine demographic, socioeconomic, and regional differences in contraceptive access, differences between telehealth and in-person contraception visits, and telehealth quality in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.Study design: We surveyed reproductive-age women about contraception visits during the COVID-19 pandemic via social media in July 2020 and January 2021. We used multivariable regression to examine relationships between age, racial/ethnic identity, educational attainment, income, insurance type, region, and COVID-19 related hardship, and ability to obtain a contraceptive appointment, telehealth vs in-person visits, and telehealth quality scores.Results: Among 2031 respondents seeking a contraception visit, 1490 (73.4%) reported any visit, of which 530 (35.6%) were telehealth. In adjusted analyses, lower odds of any visit was associated with Hispanic/ Latinx and Mixed race/Other identity (aOR 0.59 [0.37-0.94], aOR 0.36 [0.22-0.59], respectively), the South, Midwest, Northeast (aOR 0.63 [0.47-0.85], aOR 0.64 [0.46-0.90], aOR 0.52 [CI 0.36-0.75], respectively), no insurance (aOR 0.63 [0.43-0.91]), greater COVID-19 hardship (aOR 0.52 [0.31-0.87]), and earlier pandemic timing (January 2021 vs July 2020 aOR 2.14 [1.69-2.70]). Respondents from the Midwest and South had lower odds of telehealth vs in-person care (aOR 0.63 [0.44-0.88], aOR 0.54 [0.40-0.72], respectively). Hispanic/Latinx respondents and those in the Midwest had lower odds of high telehealth quality (aOR 0.37 [0.17-0.80], aOR 0.58 [0.35-0.95], respectively).Conclusions: We found inequities in contraceptive care access, less telehealth use for contraception visits in the South and Midwest, and lower telehealth quality among Hispanic/Latinx people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should focus on telehealth access, quality, and patients' preferences. Implications: Historically marginalized groups have faced disproportionate barriers to contraceptive care, and telehealth for contraceptive care has not been employed equitably during the COVID-19 pandemic. Though telehealth has the potential to improve access to care, inequitable implementation could exacerbate existing disparities.& COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Validation of the person-centered maternity care scale in India [J].
Afulani, Patience A. ;
Diamond-Smith, Nadia ;
Phillips, Beth ;
Singhal, Shreya ;
Sudhinaraset, May .
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2018, 15
[2]   Contraceptive care service provision via telehealth early in the COVID-19 pandemic at rural and urban federally qualified health centers in 2 southeastern states [J].
Beatty, Kate ;
Smith, Michael G. ;
Khoury, Amal J. ;
Ventura, Liane M. ;
Ariyo, Oluwatosin ;
de Jong, Jordan ;
Surles, Kristen ;
Slawson, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2023, 39 (01) :160-171
[3]   Assessing differences in contraceptive provision through telemedicine among reproductive health providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States [J].
Comfort, Alison B. ;
Rao, Lavanya ;
Goodman, Suzan ;
Raine-Bennett, Tina ;
Barney, Angela ;
Mengesha, Biftu ;
Harper, Cynthia C. .
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2022, 19 (01)
[4]   Addressing Social Determinants to Improve Patient Care and Promote Health Equity: An American College of Physicians Position Paper [J].
Daniel, Hilary ;
Bornstein, Sue S. ;
Kane, Gregory C. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 168 (08) :577-+
[5]   COVID-19's impact on contraception experiences: Exacerbation of structural inequities in women's health [J].
Diamond-Smith, Nadia ;
Logan, Rachel ;
Marshall, Cassondra ;
Corbetta-Rastelli, Chiara ;
Gutierrez, Sirena ;
Adler, Aliza ;
Kerns, Jennifer .
CONTRACEPTION, 2021, 104 (06) :600-605
[7]   Implementation of Obstetric Telehealth During COVID-19 and Beyond [J].
Fryer, Kimberly ;
Delgado, Arlin ;
Foti, Tara ;
Reid, Chinyere N. ;
Marshall, Jennifer .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 24 (09) :1104-1110
[8]   Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice [J].
Fuentes, Liza ;
Jerman, Jenna .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 28 (12) :1623-1631
[9]  
Goel S., NONREPRESENTATIVE SU
[10]   Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccination Likelihood Among Reproductive-Aged Women in the United States [J].
Gutierrez, Sirena ;
Logan, Rachel ;
Marshall, Cassondra ;
Kerns, Jennifer ;
Diamond-Smith, Nadia .
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2022, 137 (03) :588-596