EUS-guided biliary drainage in malignant distal biliary obstruction: An international survey to identify barriers of technology implementation

被引:6
作者
Palmieri, Vincent [1 ]
Barkun, Alan [1 ]
Forbes, Nauzer [2 ]
Martel, Myriam [1 ]
Lam, Eric [3 ]
Telford, Jennifer [3 ]
Sandha, Gurpal [4 ]
Paquin, Sarto [5 ]
Sahai, Anand [5 ]
Chen, Yen-, I [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, St Pauls Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Univ Alberta Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Ctr Hospitalier Univ Montreal, Div Gastroenterol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Glen S 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
关键词
EUS; EUS-guided biliary drainage; stent; malignant biliary obstruction; pancreatic cancer; therapeutic EUS; EXPANDABLE METAL STENTS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
D O I
10.4103/EUS-D-21-00137
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a promising alternative to ERCP in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). Despite accumulating data, however, its application in clinical practice has been impeded by undefined barriers. This study aims to evaluate the practice of EUS-BD and its barriers. Methods: An online survey was generated using Google Forms. Six gastroenterology/endoscopy associations were contacted between July 2019 and November 2019. Survey questions measured participant characteristics, EUS-BD in different clinical scenarios, and potential barriers. The primary outcome was the uptake of EUS-BD as a first-line modality, without previous ERCP attempts, in patients with MDBO. Results: Overall, 115 respondents completed the survey (2.9% response rate). Respondents were from North America (39.2%), Asia (28.6%), Europe (20%), and other jurisdictions (12.2%). Regarding the uptake of EUS-BD as first-line treatment for MDBO, only 10.5% of respondents would consider EUS-BD as a first-line modality regularly. The main concerns were the lack of high-quality data, fear of adverse events, and limited access to EUS-BD dedicated devices. On multivariable analysis, lack of access to EUS-BD expertise was an independent predictor against the use of EUS-BD, odds ratio 0.16 (95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.65). In salvage situations following failed ERCP, most favored EUS-BD (40.9%) over percutaneous drainage (21.7%) in unresectable cancer. In borderline resectable or locally advanced disease, however, most favored the percutaneous approach due to fear of EUS-BD complicating future surgery. Conclusions: EUS-BD has not reached widespread clinical adoption. Identified barriers include lack of high-quality data, fear of adverse events, and lack of access to EUS-BD dedicated devices. Fear of complicating future surgery was also identified as a barrier in potentially resectable disease.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 110
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Self-expandable metal stents versus plastic stents for malignant biliary obstruction [J].
Almadi, Majid A. ;
Barkun, Alan ;
Martel, Myriam .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (04) :852-853
[2]  
Almadi Majid A, 2015, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V25, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.giec.2015.06.002
[3]   Stent placement by EUS or ERCP for primary biliary decompression in pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial (with videos) [J].
Bang, Ji Young ;
Navaneethan, Udayakumar ;
Hasan, Muhammad ;
Hawes, Robert ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 88 (01) :9-17
[4]   Partially covered self-expandable metal stents versus polyethylene stents for malignant biliary obstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Barkun, Alan N. ;
Adam, Viviane ;
Martel, Myriam ;
AlNaamani, Khalid ;
Moses, Peter L. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 29 (07) :377-383
[5]   Surgical Innovation and Evaluation 1 Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations [J].
Barkun, Jeffrey S. ;
Aronson, Jeffrey K. ;
Feldman, Liane S. ;
Maddern, Guy J. ;
Strasberg, Steven M. .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9695) :1089-1096
[6]   ELEMENT TRIAL: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage of first intent with a lumen-apposing metal stent vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of malignant distal biliary obstruction [J].
Chen, Yen-I ;
Callichurn, Kashi ;
Chatterjee, Avijit ;
Desilets, Etienne ;
Fergal, Donnellan ;
Forbes, Nauzer ;
Gan, Ian ;
Kenshil, Sana ;
Khashab, Mouen A. ;
Kunda, Rastislav ;
Lam, Eric ;
May, Gary ;
Mohamed, Rachid ;
Mosko, Jeff ;
Paquin, Sarto C. ;
Sahai, Anand ;
Sandha, Gurpal ;
Teshima, Christopher ;
Barkun, Alan ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
Bessissow, Ali ;
Candido, Kristina ;
Martel, Myriam ;
Miller, Corey ;
Waschke, Kevin ;
Zogopoulos, George ;
Wong, Clarence .
TRIALS, 2019, 20 (01)
[8]   Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy [J].
Freeman, ML ;
Nelson, DB ;
Sherman, S ;
Haber, GB ;
Herman, ME ;
Dorsher, PJ ;
Moore, JP ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Ryan, ME ;
Shaw, MJ ;
Lande, JD ;
Pheley, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :909-918
[9]   Cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of biliary stents in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a randomized controlled trial [J].
Gardner, Timothy B. ;
Spangler, Chad C. ;
Byanova, Katerina L. ;
Ripple, Gregory H. ;
Rockacy, Matthew J. ;
Levenick, John M. ;
Smith, Kerrington D. ;
Colacchio, Thomas A. ;
Barth, Richard J. ;
Zaki, Bassem I. ;
Tsapakos, Michael J. ;
Gordon, Stuart R. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 84 (03) :460-466
[10]   Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: A new technique for biliary drainage [J].
Giovannini, M ;
Moutardier, V ;
Pesenti, C ;
Bories, E ;
Lelong, B ;
Delpero, JR .
ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 33 (10) :898-900