Oral rehabilitation and associated quality of life following mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap: a cross-sectional study

被引:4
作者
Ritschl, Lucas M. [1 ]
Singer, Hannes [1 ]
Clasen, Franz-Carl [1 ]
Haller, Bernhard [2 ]
Fichter, Andreas M. [1 ]
Deppe, Herbert [1 ]
Wolff, Klaus-Dietrich [1 ]
Weitz, Jochen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Med & Hlth, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Inst AI & Informat Med, TUM Sch Med & Hlth, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[3] Josefinum, Augsburg & Private Practice Oral & Maxillofacial S, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Augsburg, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
mandibular reconstruction; free fibula flap; dental implants; oral rehabilitation; quality of life; DENTAL REHABILITATION; ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS; ONCOLOGY PATIENTS; CANCER-PATIENTS; BONE FLAPS; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; DEFECTS; MANDIBLES; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1371405
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Mandibular reconstruction with the free fibula flap (FFF) has become a standardized procedure. The situation is different with oral rehabilitation, so the purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of implant placement and prosthetic restoration. Additionally, the patients' situation, motivation, and treatment course were structurally assessed.Materials and methods All cases between January 2013 and December 2018 that underwent mandibular reconstruction in our department with a free fibula flap and gave written informed consent to participate were interviewed with two structured questionnaires about their restoration and quality of life. Additionally, medical records, general information, status of implants and therapy, and metric analyses of the inserted implants were performed.Results In total 59 patients were enrolled and analyzed in this monocentric study. Overall, oral rehabilitation was achieved in 23.7% at the time of investigation. In detail, implants were inserted in 37.3% of patients and showed an 83.3% survival of dental implants. Of these implanted patients, dental implants were successfully restored with a prosthetic restoration in 63.6. Within this subgroup, satisfaction with the postoperative aesthetic and functional result was 79.9% and with the oral rehabilitation process was 68.2%. Satisfaction with the implant-borne prosthesis was 87.5%, with non-oral-squamous-cell-carcinoma patients being statistically significantly more content with the handling (p=0.046) and care (p=0.031) of the prosthesis.Discussion Despite the well-reconstructed bony structures, there is a need to increase the effort of achieving oral rehabilitation, especially looking at the patient's persistent motivation for the procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Dental implant placement after mandibular reconstruction by microvascular free fibula flap: Current knowledge and remaining questions [J].
Anne-Gaelle, Bodard ;
Samuel, Salino ;
Julie, Bemer ;
Renaud, Lucas ;
Pierre, Breton .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 47 (12) :1099-1104
[2]   Evaluation of use of acrylic resin-based surgical guide in the function and quality of life provided by mandibular prostheses with microvascular free fibula flap: A four-year, randomized, controlled trial [J].
Brandao, Thais Bianca ;
Vechiato Filho, Aljomar Jose ;
Prado Ribeiro, Ana Carolina ;
Mello Santiago Gebrim, Eloisa Maria ;
Bodard, Anne-Gaelle ;
da Silva, Dorival Pedroso ;
Santos-Silva, Alan Roger ;
Ishida, Luiz Carlos ;
Dias, Reinaldo Brito .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 116 (03) :457-463
[3]   Mandibular reconstruction with vascularised bone flaps: a asystematic review over 25 years. [J].
Brown, J. S. ;
Lowe, D. ;
Kanatas, A. ;
Schache, A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 55 (02) :113-126
[4]   A new classification for mandibular defects after oncological resection [J].
Brown, James S. ;
Barry, Conor ;
Ho, Michael ;
Shaw, Richard .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (01) :E23-E30
[5]   Assessment of Quality of Life After Implant-Retained Prosthetically Reconstructed Maxillae and Mandibles Postcancer Treatments [J].
Dholam, Kanchan P. ;
Bachher, Gurmit K. ;
Yadav, Prabha S. ;
Quazi, Gazwan Ahmed ;
Pusalkar, Hrishikesh A. .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2011, 20 (01) :85-94
[6]   Implant survival or implant success? Evaluation of implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients-a prospective observational study [J].
Ettl, Tobias ;
Junold, Natalie ;
Zeman, Florian ;
Hautmann, Matthias ;
Hahnel, Sebastian ;
Kolbeck, Carola ;
Mueller, Steffen ;
Klingelhoeffer, Christoph ;
Reichert, Torsten E. ;
Meier, Johannes K. .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (09) :3039-3047
[7]   Long-Term Results of Mandibular Reconstruction of Continuity Defects with Fibula Free Flap and Implant-Borne Dental Rehabilitation [J].
Fang, Wei ;
Liu, Yan-pu ;
Ma, Qin ;
Liu, Bao-Lin ;
Zhao, Yimin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (01) :169-178
[8]   Rehabilitation with endosseous implants in fibula free-flap mandibular reconstruction: A case series of up to 10 years [J].
Ferrari, S. ;
Copelli, C. ;
Bianchi, B. ;
Ferri, A. ;
Poli, T. ;
Ferri, T. ;
Gallesi, P. ;
Sesenna, E. ;
Brevi, B. C. .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (02) :172-178
[9]  
Fierz Janine, 2013, Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, V123, P91
[10]  
GreSS Stefan, 2007, Healthc Policy, V3, P29