International students' perspectives on the genetic counseling application process

被引:1
作者
Galada, Chelna [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Blake, Alise K. [3 ]
Dean, Lori Williamson [1 ]
Rao, Smita K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Genet Counseling, Little Rock, AR USA
[2] CARTI Canc Ctr, Little Rock, AR USA
[3] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Oncol, Memphis, TN USA
[4] Genexsure LLC, Nashville, TN USA
[5] CARTI Canc Ctr, 8901 Carti Way, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
关键词
application process; diversity; education; equity; genetic counseling programs; international genetic counseling applicants; underrepresented populations; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCE; INTERVIEWS;
D O I
10.1002/jgc4.1893
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Between 2018 and 2023, one percent of matched applicants to North American genetic counseling graduate programs (GCGPs) have been international applicants (IAs). The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in the GCGP application processes in 2020, most notably the incorporation of virtual interviews and GRE waivers, which uniquely impacted IAs. Twelve international genetic counseling (GC) students who matriculated into a U.S.-based GCGP in 2021 or 2022 participated in this qualitative study (42% of the total enrolled) to understand their application experience. Cost, location of the program, and rapport during interviews were the most important factors identified by IAs to apply to and rank the GCGPs. Shadowing and volunteer experiences relevant to GC were cited as important for applicants to learn about a genetic counseling career, but many had challenges finding opportunities in their home countries. Unique logistical challenges in taking the GRE, transcript evaluation services, and standardized English proficiency tests were described. Although virtual interviews offered the same experience as domestic applicants, the time difference was a major challenge, requiring IAs to interview through the night, creating additional stressors. Nine of 12 were re-applicants and shared that engaging with GCGPs early in the process was beneficial for improving applications and, at times, requesting waivers for transcript evaluation requirements and considering unique volunteering experiences. Participants suggested GCGPs can address barriers by providing more specific information on their websites as it pertains to IAs, and contact information for the international student office. Improving awareness of the applicants' backgrounds, home country experiences, and time zone differences would provide IAs with a more equitable application experience. Addressing these barriers could help promote diversity, equity, and inclusion allowing for more IAs and the growth of the genetic counseling profession.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Examining career shadowing in genetic counseling: Perspectives of shadowees, program directors, and genetic counselors
    Agre, Katherine
    Essendrup, Anna
    Koellner, Christine
    Rust, Laura
    Deyle, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2021, 30 (05) : 1428 - 1439
  • [2] Professional Issues of International Genetic Counseling Students Educated in the United States
    Akgumus, Gozde
    Shah, Divya
    Higgs, Lydia
    Valverde, Kathleen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2016, 25 (04) : 664 - 676
  • [3] Exploring racial and ethnic minority individuals' journey to becoming genetic counselors: Mapping paths to diversifying the genetic counseling profession
    Alvarado-Wing, Tatiana E.
    Marshall, Jennifer
    Best, Alicia
    Gomez, Joanne
    Cragun, Deborah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2021, 30 (06) : 1522 - 1534
  • [4] Reflections on diversity, equity, and inclusion in genetic counseling education
    Bao, Annie K.
    Bergner, Amanda L.
    Chan-Smutko, Gayun
    Villiers, Janelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2020, 29 (02) : 315 - 323
  • [5] Standardized applications for genetic counseling graduate programs: Opinions of program directors
    Beasley, Erin
    Mauer, Caitlin
    Mersch, Jacqueline
    Pirzadeh-Miller, Sara
    Lahiri, Sayoni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2022, 31 (02) : 489 - 496
  • [6] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [7] A Randomized Study to Assess the Effect of Including the Graduate Record Examinations Results on Reviewer Scores for Underrepresented Minorities
    Dang, Kristina, V
    Rerolle, Francois
    Ackley, Sarah F.
    Irish, Amanda M.
    Mehta, Kala M.
    Bailey, Inez
    Fair, Elizabeth
    Miller, Cecily
    Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
    Wong-Moy, Eva
    Glymour, M. Maria
    Morris, Meghan D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 190 (09) : 1744 - 1750
  • [8] Estien C. O., 2022, B ECOL SOC AM, V104
  • [9] Factors Associated With Colon and Rectal Surgery Fellowship Program Ranking Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Goffredo, Paolo
    Sun, Mark Y.
    Jensen, Christine C.
    Trudel, Judith L.
    Madoff, Robert D.
    Lowry, Ann C.
    Gaertner, Wolfgang B.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (10) : 1163 - 1166
  • [10] Direct Comparison of In-Person Versus Virtual Interviews for Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship in the COVID-19 Era
    Grova, Monica M.
    Donohue, Sean J.
    Meyers, Michael O.
    Kim, Hong Jin
    Ollila, David W.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (04) : 1908 - 1915