Clinical Experience of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in 6159 Ultrasonically Abnormal Fetuses

被引:2
|
作者
Song, Tingting [1 ]
Xu, Ying [1 ]
Li, Yu [1 ]
Zheng, Jiao [1 ]
Guo, Fenfen [1 ]
Jin, Xin [1 ]
Li, Jia [1 ]
Zhang, Jianfang [1 ]
Yang, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Xian 710032, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Prenatal diagnosis; Ultrasound abnormalities; Copy number variations; Chromosomal microarray analysis; Uniparental disomy; NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM ARRAY; COPY-NUMBER VARIANTS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s43032-023-01399-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
A single-center retrospective study of G-band karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for the invasive prenatal diagnosis of 6159 fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities was conducted. This study aimed to investigate the incidence rates of chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes and postpartum clinical manifestations by long-term follow-up and to explore the correlation between different types of prenatal ultrasound abnormalities and pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities. The overall incidence of pathogenic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities was 7.58% (467/6159), which comprised 41.7% (195/467) with chromosome number abnormalities, 57.6% (269/467) with pathogenic copy-number variations (pCNVs), and 0.64% (3/467) with uniparental disomy (UPD). In addition, 1.72% (106/6159) with likely pathogenic copy-number variations (lpCNVs) and 3.04% (187/6159) with variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were detected by CMA. Ultrasound abnormalities were categorized into structural anomalies and soft marker anomalies. The incidence rate of pathogenic and likely pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher among fetuses with structural anomalies than soft markers (11.13% vs 7.59%, p < 0.01). We retrospectively analyzed the prenatal genetic outcomes for a large cohort of fetuses with different types of ultrasound abnormalities. The present study showed that the chromosomal abnormality rate and clinical outcomes of fetuses with different types of ultrasound abnormalities varied greatly. Our data have important implications for prenatal genetic counseling for fetuses with different types of ultrasound abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1107
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with &gt;1000 cases and review of the literature
    Breman, Amy
    Pursley, Amber N.
    Hixson, Patricia
    Bi, Weimin
    Ward, Patricia
    Bacino, Carlos A.
    Shaw, Chad
    Lupski, James R.
    Beaudet, Arthur
    Patel, Ankita
    Cheung, Sau W.
    Van den Veyver, Ignatia
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2012, 32 (04) : 351 - 361
  • [22] The assessing of clinical relevance of chromosomal microarray analysis in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction
    Li, Peng
    Wu, Wenli
    Zhang, Xiaoyun
    Li, Yuting
    Liu, Miao
    Wang, Yanping
    Man, Dongmei
    Wang, Fengge
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [23] Clinical application of chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and normal karyotype
    Su, Linjuan
    Huang, Hailong
    An, Gang
    Cai, Meiying
    Wu, Xiaoqing
    Li, Ying
    Xie, Xiaorui
    Lin, Yuan
    Wang, Meiying
    Xu, Liangpu
    MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (08):
  • [24] Chromosomal microarray analysis versus noninvasive prenatal testing in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency
    Wang, Chaohong
    Tang, Junxiang
    Tong, Keting
    Huang, Daoqi
    Tu, Huayu
    Zhu, Jiansheng
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 67 (09) : 533 - 539
  • [25] Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) a Clinical Diagnostic Tool in the Prenatal and Postnatal Settings
    Batzir, Nurit Assia
    Shohat, Mordechai
    Maya, Idit
    PEDIATRIC ENDOCRINOLOGY REVIEWS PER, 2015, 13 (01) : 448 - 454
  • [26] Diagnostic accuracy and value of chromosomal microarray analysis for chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal detection A prospective clinical study
    Huang, Hailong
    Wang, Yan
    Zhang, Min
    Lin, Na
    An, Gang
    He, Deqin
    Chen, Meihuan
    Chen, Lingji
    Xu, Liangpu
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (20) : E25999
  • [27] Is it time for prenatal chromosomal-microarray analysis to all women? A review of the diagnostic yield in structurally normal fetuses
    Daum, Hagit
    Stern, Shira
    Shkedi-Rafid, Shiri
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 33 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [28] Chromosomal mosaicism detected by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhong, Mei
    Zheng, Dezhong
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 25 (01) : 358 - 366
  • [29] Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis
    Levy, Brynn
    Wapner, Ronald
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (02) : 201 - 212
  • [30] Chromosomal microarray analysis for pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening who undergo invasive prenatal testing
    Wu, Xiaoqing
    Li, Ying
    Lin, Na
    Xie, Xiaorui
    Su, Linjuan
    Cai, Meiying
    Lin, Yuan
    Wang, Linshuo
    Wang, Meiying
    Xu, Liangpu
    Huang, Hailong
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 25 (13) : 6271 - 6279